It was literally at the peak of the Bund's popularity

According to the article and specially the first quote you took from it, it was not. Their popularity was declining and the event was a response to that

So when someone claims that the Bund was popular, citing an event, and I cite the actual details of that same event showing that the accusation of popularity is highly dubious, the burden of proof is on me.

No, the claim was that the movement was popular and then declined. You cannot take half a claim and make it whole

So if I claim Michael Jackson was blank and then turned white, you cannot show pics when he was already white and claim he was never black

I didn't realize "When the biggest event they ever manage to have is outnumbered by counterprotesters 5-1 maybe they just aren't that popular in the country" was such a huge leap of logic.

I think I will explained that already bud