[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

It was literally at the peak of the Bund's popularity

According to the article and specially the first quote you took from it, it was not. Their popularity was declining and the event was a response to that

So when someone claims that the Bund was popular, citing an event, and I cite the actual details of that same event showing that the accusation of popularity is highly dubious, the burden of proof is on me.

No, the claim was that the movement was popular and then declined. You cannot take half a claim and make it whole

So if I claim Michael Jackson was blank and then turned white, you cannot show pics when he was already white and claim he was never black

I didn't realize "When the biggest event they ever manage to have is outnumbered by counterprotesters 5-1 maybe they just aren't that popular in the country" was such a huge leap of logic.

I think I will explained that already bud

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Remove every possible right... They have already stopped women from access to abortion and are going after contraception and divorce

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

According to whom? This was literally the example presented for this case and SCOTUS rules it was A-OK

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Literally anything... Have his opponents assassinated, openly take bribes in exchange for killing regulations or selling pardons or us citizenship... Anything

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago

Again, not popular anymore at that point.

To prove the point you seem to ba making, you'd need to find a quote that backs the notion they were never popular

At some point people gushed over Mel Gibson, then his crazy was made public and he lost favour. Could I take his popularity numbers from 5 years ago and pretend he wasn't super famous ever?

Op claims they were popular for a while and then not. You seem to take evidence from the "then not" part of the story and seemingly use it to prove they were never popular

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

So they were popular and then declined. Exactly what OP claimed

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Cool, thanks for the info and link

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

Hmmm those are showing 3 colors which mean they are most likely Tuckerina and Michelle

[-] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

Any, whatever he does, it would be valid an de would be immune

[-] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago

But realistically if you dont get yourself involved then you will be just fine

Unless you are a woman or a minority or disabled or poor or an immigrant or not Christian or ...

[-] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Herpes free just by booking

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Which magical country is this? Can I come?

;-)

I'm actually curious (kind of desperate for some good news nowadays). Not trying to make fun of you

177
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
147
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The FTC uncovered a series of texts between Pioneer Natural Resources CEO Scott Sheffield and OPEC officials agreeing to limit oil production to raise prices.

They raked in huge profits, while their scheme cost consumers $200 billion a year in higher prices.

That’s about $3000 a year per family.

view more: next ›

exanime

joined 4 months ago