this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
962 points (95.8% liked)

Just Post

643 readers
43 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Where it matters is which sock is putting judges on the Supreme Court. Trump added three in his last stint. Seeing as they tend to sit for 30+ years, this has generational impact.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

One of those could have been avoided if Ginsberg would have retired when she was supposed to.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)

When was she supposed to retire? Republicans didn't even hold a vote for Merrick Garland under Obama's presidency, so if your answer was during that term, then there'd be no chance she would have been replaced, and she'd be blamed for retiring too early.

Blaming Ginsburg for Republican fuckery is misguided and can only be justified with the benefit of hindsight, which she didn't have at the time.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Any time prior to 2015. The Democrats didn't lose their Senate majority until the 2014 elections.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She was supposed to have the foresight to assume that the six months or so when they had a majority (when they passed ACA) was the last time Democrats would have the slightest hope of appointing a new supreme court justice.

What a fool she was! Not knowing the future!

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The house does not vote on judges. Only the Senate. Obama had a friendly Senate until Jan 2015. They could even have done it during the lame duck session. But in reality the Senate was widely forecasted to change control so she could have retired in the spring without controversy.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But they didn't have the supermajority necessary to overcome a filibuster anymore. Even the cloture rule enacted in 2013 excluded supreme court nominations.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

And that would have been gone in a hot second if they blocked RBG's replacement. They removed exactly what they needed to confirm judges.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

During the fucking clinton administration, bitch was old as hell.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

2009-2015 was a pretty big window dude.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

You know, with the way everything just seems to go Trumps way in the end, a person might almost theorize there's a conspiracy.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump didn't do it all on his lonesome. He did it with senatorial approval.

The president is not a king... yet. Treating it like the only position that matters is a big part of the problem.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe not a king, but SCOTUS ruled that the president is above the law.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Which is all the more reason to pay attention to congressional races.