this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
13 points (93.3% liked)

theory

560 readers
15 users here now

A community for in-depth discussion of books, posts that are better suited for [email protected] will be removed.

The hexbear rules against sectarian posts or comments will be strictly enforced here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Explain the bookclub: We are reading Volumes 1, 2, and 3 in one year and discussing it in weekly threads. (Volume IV, often published under the title Theories of Surplus Value, will not be included in this particular reading club, but comrades are encouraged to do other solo and collaborative reading.) This bookclub will repeat yearly. The three volumes in a year works out to about 6½ pages a day for a year, 46⅔ pages a week.

I'll post the readings at the start of each week and @mention anybody interested. Let me know if you want to be added or removed.


Just joining us? You can use the archives below to help you reading up to where the group is. There is another reading group on a different schedule at https://lemmygrad.ml/c/genzhou (federated at [email protected] ) which may fit your schedule better. The idea is for the bookclub to repeat annually, so there's always next year.

Archives: Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26 – Week 27


Week 28, July 8-14. From Volume 2, we are reading Parts 10-13 of Chapter 20, Simple Reproduction.


https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1885-c2/index.htm


Discuss the week's reading in the comments.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I found this part really interesting, mainly contradictions being transferred to a wider sphere

Foreign trade could help out in either case: in the first case in order to convert commodities I held in the form of money into articles of consumption, and in the second case to dispose of the commodity surplus. But since foreign trade does not merely replace certain elements (also with regard to value), it only transfers the contradictions to a wider sphere and gives them greater latitude.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Foreign trade is just adding an extension onto the circuit, like adding an extra extension onto a raceway. It changes the dynamics, but not the fundamentals - capital is still racing around the racetrack (in this tortured analogy). Capitalism today is much more globalized; foreign trade is the norm on a lot of basic goods. And yet, we see all the same contradictions and failures of Marx's time, where much more economic activity stayed circulating within a region.

I was going to say something about how it's all a closed system, but that's not really accurate (this is the chapter on reproduction, after all).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's a good point, I neglected to connected it back to the circuit.