this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
45 points (97.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13394 readers
959 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's a rule the DoL issued in 2019 to "clarify" the prior FLSA regulations. I've also never heard of getting OT on benefits and I doubt there was any real confusion. Whether its good policy, I dunno. It's plausible to me that including non-cash compensation in overtime would disincentive benefits in a way that left the worker worse off, but, ya know, maybe healthcare and retirement shouldn't be contingent on one's employer.

Anyway, this is the Heritage Foundation trying to convert that rule to a law.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

I would like one and a half health insurances when I work late, please.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

from what that link says, it sounds like the rule was made mostly to get around employers saying "this part of your paycheck is a bonus, not a wage, so it's exempt from the time and a half rule"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's a good point. I suppose this could be important for folks paid on commission and things like that.