this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)

electoralism

21966 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All academic since it would never actually happen, but it seems like 3rd parties enjoy more success under parliamentary systems, and super unpopular governments can be tossed out more easily. Would things be any better?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

uh.... explain?

I'm a dummy. Why is the USA's bicameral system not technically "parliamentary"?

PS: – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_system – ok I guess the fact that the boss man is elected separately makes it not "parliamentary"; "parliamentary" means the leader of the parliament is the head-of-state.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ya there's a few other quirks that come along with it I think. Governments can be dissolved and elections called much easier, for instance

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yeah, the USA has that rigid electoral calendar, elections are not 'called'

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

For one, a third party can gain a foothold much more easily. In the UK, for example, small parties to the left of Labour can win and hold seats in Parliament.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's about how much power the head of state has. If they directly run the government and make policy, presidential (or Prussian Constitutional, in the case of a monarchy). If they don't and the power is defacto devolved to a parliamentary cabinet appointed by the representatives, parliamentary. If you're the French and De Gaulle fucked up your government to maintain power, semi-presidential.

The advantage of parliamentary systems is they fail quickly and cleanly. If the governing representatives lose the ability to vote in a budget, they're not in power anymore (either a new coalition forms organically, or elections are called), while a US system can fuck around for decades with an inability to pass policy. The downside is the difficulty in making and maintaining stable majorities, see Belgium.