Fuck AI

1443 readers

140 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

274

Hasbro CEO Says Everyone's Doing it, so They Need to use Generative AI to Keep Up (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You should never support the scumbags at Hasbro/WOTC if you are into tabletop games

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah like people aren't using existing materials in their campaigns.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These are not the same. Here are some of the ways someone may be fine with reusing existing material while being against AI:

Someone may value thoughtful and coherent world building, while feeling like the AI generated amalgamation dilutes the cohesiveness of the material.
Someone can be for public sharing of ideas, while simultaneously against AI companies disregarding licenses attached to those ideas to build AI products.
Someone can value the personality and individual perspective that a content author or DM injects into material and feel that AI-generated material lacks this character.

Don’t reduce the use of AI down to the reuse of material. It also averages out material into some sort of lowest common denominator - sacrificing exactly the things that many niche fandoms value: personality and imagination.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And getting suggestions to help form your story takes any of those away?

I agree with the licensing implications but I doubt many people seek licenses from these guys before taking inspiration.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To some people, yes. To others, no. You’re replying to specific people who seem to be against the idea, and I’m guessing for them it detracts significantly from the experience.

At the end of the day all of the concepts we have in fantasy are derivative in some regard, so the line will vary just like it will vary for people that want to do total homebrew vs following a book.

My group dabbled with AI when it was at its peak buzz, and if I’m honest, my head cannon sort of ignores those bits. They don’t carry the same authenticity that I came to expect from my group. It detracts from my experience because I play ttrpgs primarily to learn about my friends and how they’ve interpreted a shared world, not to hear algorithmically mid fanfic. I’m also not crazy about following a book. With a book, at least I know someone willfully released the work into the world and is getting appropriately compensated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As either inspiration or use it directly for a game that isn't for profit.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Personal use implies not for profit. And I feel it's expecting a lot for all DMs to create their own art.