this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
114 points (99.1% liked)
askchapo
22764 readers
409 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They aren't writing in support of Hemingway, Hemingway is just an easy "Even dumb guys at least read this" example
This part is important in understanding their meaning. They aren't being narrowly prescriptive, they're just pulling at recognizable examples.
I guess so yeah. It just seems weird, the crime fiction one stands out to me, since people still love true crime for many of the wrong reasons.
Crime fiction is substantially different from true crime. Do you think a podcast about a serial killer has the same sort of content as a detective novel? Yeah, sometimes they revel a bit to much in the violence of the murder, but they really aren't the same thing. One is basically about the crime from a pretty third-person omniscient perspective and the other is usually grounded very strongly in the perspective of the detective and involves their interiority and sometimes other issues they have going on (addiction and exes are the classic ones, but there are others).
I'd also argue that crime fiction typically isn't exploiting the murders and grief of actual people, which changes how you relate to it.
I guess crime fiction has a more regular tendency to be copaganda, but I think they can both do that, as well as having that disdain for "undesirables" built in. I think they're pretty similar, myself.