this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
1173 points (97.0% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1109 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Stop spying on your kid... Jesus.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even worse using kaspersky...

[–] President 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Kaspersky is part of Big C and actively tries to suppress knowledge of Rust.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Invasive reports of literally everything. Making it way too easy to control your child to the point of psychical damage, and with some parents a tool for abuse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kids need access to the internet at a super young age these days for school. If you don't have some sort of filter in place when they are in single digits or tweens you are just negligent. The internet has some dark corners.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't mind just filters, but reporting it to the parent doesn't sit right with me. It probably depends on the parent though

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there’s a reliable way to only be alerted to specific activity, then the parents aren’t really actively spying, in the sense that the kids still have privacy when they aren’t transgressing into prohibited space. As long as that prohibited space is reasonable (huge debate possible there of course) and the kids know about the restrictions. imo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this post is about a child being blocked then reported to their parents for 'teaching crabs to read'
I don't think you can defend it as a reasonable prohibited space

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

True. But the comment I was replying to was referencing the monitoring itself, not the outcome.