chapotraphouse

13535 readers

906 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Weird Christian sectarianism on the left (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We've all seen it, and it has become more and more prevalent in recent years. I get the desire to dunk on WASPs, and that's all in good fun as far as I'm concerned, but I'm getting really tired of reading these weird theological arguments from leftists who think that the problem is the ideological framework of Calvinism or whatever. No. The prots have institutional influence where you live, and that's all there is to it. In the (many) countries where the Catholic church has institutional influence, they're the bastards.

They're the bastards where I live, but I'm not going to start blaming it on the dogma of transubstantiation or whatever, because that would be bad analysis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm not going to start blaming it on the dogma of transubstantiation or whatever, because that would be bad analysis.

Amusing that you call this out (correctly, imo) and get rewarded with a thread full of assholes tripping over themselves to say "DAE Christianity/religion bad?!" instead of any meaningful thought regarding this

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am allowed to say Christianity is bad, but i would correctly be labeled a racist to say that islam or judaism is bad

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it's fine to say Christianity is bad, I just think doing so in a fashion that is that dismissive in a thread about "weird christian sectarianism on the left" that talks about bad analysis is maybe not the place to do it if you aren't going to give any reasoning. That said, I didn't intentionally call you out and I apologize for that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

No no its okay im low-effort shjtposting on a serious question i deserve it lmao

I have no thoughts in my brain i go completely off of vibes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'll be the first to admit that I'm an asshole, but I wasn't in my comment about Christianity being objectively bad. That's not a spicy take. It's like saying anthropogenic climate change is happening.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This was not great phrasing on my part. Arising partly a result of spending a fair bit of time with someone who used "asshole" to mean "person selected at random" but partly because I do think that coming in evidencing the behavior the post is about with a completely dismissive take with no reasoning given is rude. In essence OP is saying they think this behavior is problematic and it is being used as an invitation to display it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ok, I can get behind that, But would my original comment of "Christianity is objectively bad" be more welcomed if it was followed by a bullet list of examples? I'd think you still would have called me an asshole in that case. I wasn't trying to pick on OP, and I'm of the opinion that all organized religion is objectively bad, but Christianity has proven over the millennia to be at least one of the worst offenders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I guess I can't say for sure, but I think if you had a list of examples it would have been fine. I'm not religious myself, if that's your impression I just found the thread ironic giving the OP's statement and the initial comment rush.