this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
993 points (98.4% liked)

Programming Humor

2736 readers
257 users here now

Related Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Other Programming Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’m not sure, but that’s exciting if so

GIMP UI as is hasn’t changed much in 20 years.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I remember GIMPshop being a thing back in the day. It was much easier for me, but it was abandoned ages ago. PhotoGIMP is fine, but it's missing a lot of the QoL stuff that makes Photoshop better.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah

And that’s not to say GIMP is bad software, it’s competing with a design app that’s almost a monopoly worth billions of dollars. That’s a high bar to beat for free.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Oh, no kidding! I have nothing but love for it. I'm just over here musing about it. The fact that it can do so much and get that close is damned amazing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And their invented forced onto you file system 🤢you can't open a jpg, change sonething and then you jhave to dance around the export, nit save when clising etc etc. Why devs, why?

Would be super cool if they got things up just a bit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you can't do what ? I have trouble following you

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They are complaining that Gimp only allows to save in reconstructable formats (e.g. xcf) even when you opened baked fileformats (in this case jpeg)

In Gimp you have to export to those file formats as you would lose layer and history data as they don't support that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ah, yes, saving and exporting used to be conflated. That shouldn't be a problem, just hit export instead of save

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah and then when you close the image it says it hasn't been saved, which is both annoying and error prone.

Not a super big deal you'd say but when you resize lots of images it is, for example. Especially as it worked differently and one day they forced this bad UX choice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I see how that’s useful for workflows…

I have the same complaint with Affinity Photo when I make Star Trek memes and now have a bunch of .afphoto project files, when I’m often just adding text to a jpeg.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why devs, why?

When you're opening a jpeg it is transformed into a Gimp datafile so you can edit it.
"Saving" as jpeg would remove all your editing history, collapse all layers, and perform lossy compression on the resulting image.
Since losing most of the info included in your open file is not really what you want when you hit "save", they put it behind the "Export" button.

I guess it would be more logically consistent if the workflow for editing images was to create a new Gimp project, then import a jpeg into it, the way some video editing software does it.
But that would be even less convenient.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I know, I just don't want to save that clutter in a file format you can't use elsewhere.

Photoshop only makes you save in the .psd format if you have added layers, data outside the image etc. Otherwise it just saves it to a jpg or png or whatever it was when you opened it. This is the correct way IMO.