this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
372 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12554 readers
451 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I understand the "slippery slope" issue but what an insane waste of food just over liability and pointing out the obvious.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not as bad as you think. Grocery stores will just send it back to the manufacturer and re-sticker it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What a waste of fuel and cause of extra pollutants for nothing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It isn't over nothing, though. Allergen information was missing.

Sure, it seems silly in this case, but not enforcing it also leaves wiggle-room that you really don't want for food labelling, otherwise companies could just start leaving stuff out of it because it's "obvious".

No-one with a nut allergy wants to be unexpectedly landed in the morgue because the company didn't put "contains cashews" in the label for their satay, since it's obvious, as nearly every satay sauce on the market contains cashews.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Oof, so to prove your point, I always thought satay was peanuts.

[–] rumba 2 points 1 month ago

send it back

Just pay the end companies to put stickers on it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

What about putting a sticker over it?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a person with allergies to specific foods, then don't make this mistake. Measure twice, cut once. These rules were written in blood, and tiniest violin for companies who fail it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah I guess a solution that reduces food waste while also being safe for people with milk allergies and intolerances would be to slap a big ass "contains milk" sticker on the label, maybe covering up the barcode so that 1) it can't be sold without the sticker, and 2) they can sell it at a discount. But that's probably bad for costco's image or whatever

[–] Cethin 3 points 1 month ago

If I were a customer who purchased this, I would just ignore it. I assume many will do the same. It isn't worth dealing with if it isn't an issue for you.