treadful

Now I'm just wondering what it would be like to puppet my scrotum.

Imagine if Congress actually utilized the power they hold instead of constantly giving it up.

I had no idea her name was Nana Visitor, so the title made no sense. What a name.

The Daily Dot was provided with approximately 794,000 usernames for what are believed to be the site’s current and former members, as well as the contents of the platform’s 221 public and 395 private chat servers. [...] The Real World claims it currently has over 113,000 active users. If accurate, the site at minimum would generate upwards of $5,650,000 every month.

Jesus, why is this bullshit that large?

Accordign to wikipedia/Putin, it probably wasn't an RS-26.

Later that day, Vladimir Putin confirmed that the strike had indeed not been performed by an ICBM, but a new model of IRBM, using a non-nuclear hypersonic payload.

May as well. Let's just full send it. Just stop thinking about it. Embrace the spectacle.

You're not alone.

I like to create software tools for people smarter than me to create bigger and better things.

Disagree. Or at least, that's just a side effect. I like talking to people about their expertise.

Cyber-sexy things give me anxiety.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the CA only signing your public key to prove identity/authority? I don't think the CA can magically MITM every cert they sign.

The impact is not serious enough to warrant a $1m entry fee, IMO. At best, someone could impersonate a site. They'd also have to get other things in line (e.g. DNS hijacking) to be at all successful anyway. And it's not like most people are authenticating certs themselves. They just trust browsers to trust CAs that vouch for you and prevents those scary browser warnings.

It doesn't improve encryption compared to a self-signed cert though.

They came up with the ACME protocol, so presumably somebody could. The real barrier to entry is the cost of getting into that certificate chain of trust. I have no idea why it's so difficult and expensive.