this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22814 readers
418 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
wasn't Harper's Ferry widely condemned at the time by the liberal masses? not well read on the topic but I've seen people compare October 7th to it for that reason.
Some yes, but major public intellectuals were on his side worldwide. Victor Hugo sent a letter in support.
It was, but it kicked off the Civil War just a few years later. In terms of making people get off their asses and do the right thing* it's solidly in first place so far.
*Only after much kicking, screaming, denial, and eventual failure to deliver fully on the true end of slavery in the US.
Yeah I think saying he kicked off the civil war is a huge reach
It happened because of economics not because the north grew a conscience or feared imminent uprising
also slavery still isn't truly ended, let alone legally ended
i mean, I think the civil war was gonna happen anyway right? isn't this a bit great man ish?
100%. JB was an absolute sick bloke but Harper’s ferry was a huge L
It 100% would've happened anyway, but Harper's Ferry was the fire under the southern aristocracy's ass to go through with it because suddenly there was a very real example of a northerner actively instigating mass slave rebellions to destroy their way of life. Had it not happened, the civil war might not have occurred for another decade or two instead of within five years.