this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15866 readers
536 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

they have another one! do you think they keep these in a folder? so pathetic.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

probably, unfortunately debate pervert is terminal, once you've succumbed to it you'll never recover.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm sure of it.

And why do these debatelords only ever reflexively invoke the same one or two fallacies all the time? Where's the love for equivocation? The non sequitur? The composition fallacy! Lord knows they have enough experience with that last one

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Sorry thats an ad hominem, that's -5 epic baconrinos for you!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used non-sequitor! Dude was trying to compare the situation in Ukraine to the Palestinian crisis, saying that if Russia was justified in invading Ukraine (which was not my arguement) then Israel was justified in occupying Palestine!

They of course rejected the idea that it was a non-sequitor and continued posting bizarre things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wait, didn't Palestine hold the area before (current) Israel? I'm terrible at modern history.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Looks like an uncle and nephew shidding together.