no mods are actually named is this ok to be here?
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15915 readers
3 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but could someone please explain what's wrong (/Gen)? It looks like someone posted asking what straight people felt more attracted to (in an odd way, not how I'd phrase that question), and someone gave their answer. Is it that last sentence? Just trying to better understand so I can be a better ally.
it's that they're reducing trans people to their genitals and saying they'll date a man if they have the "right" parts but won't date a woman who doesn't. it's objectifying, essentializing, and gross. trans men are men and trans women are women.
Is it because they're saying that they are straight that makes it an issue? "I'm only attracted to women, and that includes pre op men" kind of attitude. I can see why that's wrong, bit surprised at myself for not thinking of that on my own.
Or are you saying that having a genital preference in general is wrong? Would he have been wrong if he said he'd only date cis or post op women?
it's that trans people aren't defined by their genitals and trying to express attraction in terms of genitals is fucked from the start. you can't see anyone's genitals until you're in bed with them -- if you don't want to have sex with someone until they're post op, that's fine, but saying you aren't attracted to people with the wrong genitals reverses cause and effect.