Games

32704 readers

1342 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

439

SAG-AFTRA votes unanimously to expand its strike to include the games industry (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Key issues up for negotiation include pay and conditions, but also "protections against unrestrained use of artificial intelligence", specifically the impact upon performance capture artists.

The companies involved in the negotiations include Activision, Disney, EA, Epic Games, Insomniac, Take 2, and Warner Bros.

"It has been nearly a year since SAG-AFTRA's video game contract, the Interactive Media Agreement, was extended beyond the original expiration date as we negotiated with the companies for critical terms SAG-AFTRA members need," the statement explains.

"Unfortunately, throughout the negotiations, the companies have failed to address those needs. For this reason, the negotiating committee and National Board unanimously agreed that the union should have a member-approved strike authorisation in hand when bargaining resumes on 26th September."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Nice nice, worker rights and less AI in video games. Win win.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Workers rights absolutely. Pay your human workers even while using ai to make a great product. AI didn’t do anything to me, it’s how the companies decide to use it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh yeah I'm sure they will use the ai to pay human workers as well. You definitely know that if they are allowed to use ai they won't use it in a way that means they can stop paying humans and can just have ais generate everything all whist delivering a lower quality product to the customer.

It's a win win, as long as you are an executive or a shareholder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know.. this is a development industry. I think this will just accelerate the move to AI.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Or more Ai as a cash incentive. It's already an industry that creates npc's, Ai will improve this, Indy's might just sit there and craft perfect Ai actors and license them out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey voice actors, take this five bucks today so we can make your job vanish tomorrow, it's a win win! For us. Not you. This guy thinks you should do it though because we already... make npcs? That you currently voice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just think it's inevitable that we will see fully voiced and interactive ai npc companions. I'm not saying it's good or bad, I'm in a union and I'm pro worker but this is tech and I think tech is gonna tech.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's inevitable if you give up and let companies do whatever they want yes. It's not if you get them to sign papers and lobby for regulation to protect workers.

I don't understand this defeatist mentality at all sorry.