this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
489 points (96.7% liked)

World News

32351 readers
360 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Schoolgirls who refused to change out of the loose-fitting robes have been sent home with a letter to parents on secularism.


French public schools have sent dozens of girls home for refusing to remove their abayas – long, loose-fitting robes worn by some Muslim women and girls – on the first day of the school year, according to Education Minister Gabriel Attal.

Defying a ban on the garment seen as a religious symbol, nearly 300 girls showed up on Monday morning wearing abayas, Attal told the BFM broadcaster on Tuesday.

Most agreed to change out of the robe, but 67 refused and were sent home, he said.

The government announced last month it was banning the abaya in schools, saying it broke the rules on secularism in education that have already seen headscarves forbidden on the grounds they constitute a display of religious affiliation.

The move gladdened the political right but the hard left argued it represented an affront to civil liberties.

The 34-year-old minister said the girls refused entry on Monday were given a letter addressed to their families saying that “secularism is not a constraint, it is a liberty”.

If they showed up at school again wearing the gown there would be a “new dialogue”.

He added that he was in favour of trialling school uniforms or a dress code amid the debate over the ban.

Uniforms have not been obligatory in French schools since 1968 but have regularly come back on the political agenda, often pushed by conservative and far-right politicians.

Attal said he would provide a timetable later this year for carrying out a trial run of uniforms with any schools that agree to participate.

“I don’t think that the school uniform is a miracle solution that solves all problems related to harassment, social inequalities or secularism,” he said.

But he added: “We must go through experiments, try things out” in order to promote debate, he said.


‘Worst consequences’

Al Jazeera’s Natacha Butler, reporting from Paris before the ban came into force said Attal deemed the abaya a religious symbol which violates French secularism.

“Since 2004, in France, religious signs and symbols have been banned in schools, including headscarves, kippas and crosses,” she said.

“Gabriel Attal, the education minister, says that no one should walk into a classroom wearing something which could suggest what their religion is.”

On Monday, President Emmanuel Macron defended the controversial measure, saying there was a “minority” in France who “hijack a religion and challenge the republic and secularism”.

He said it leads to the “worst consequences” such as the murder three years ago of teacher Samuel Paty for showing Prophet Muhammad caricatures during a civics education class.

“We cannot act as if the terrorist attack, the murder of Samuel Paty, had not happened,” he said in an interview with the YouTube channel, HugoDecrypte.

An association representing Muslims has filed a motion with the State Council, France’s highest court for complaints against state authorities, for an injunction against the ban on the abaya and the qamis, its equivalent dress for men.

The Action for the Rights of Muslims (ADM) motion is to be examined later on Tuesday.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Honytawk 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, every religious sign is banned.

Christians are just less of an arse when it comes to those symbols. They either stop wearing it or hide it under clothes.

But if a Christian came in wearing a hat with a cross on top, they would also get send home.

Same with orthodox Jews. They need to hide their payot or will be send home.

If you can't handle secularism in education, don't go live in a secular country.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

How exactly do you hide sideburns?

If they wear a hat to put them under, it'd probably be interpreted as a religious head covering and they'd be sent home anyways.

Christians are just less of an arse when it comes to those symbols.

That's like saying that Christians are less of an arse when it comes to religious dietary rules. It's just not a part of their religion in the same way that not proselytizing is a part of Judaism.

Honestly, as someone who grew up in the US, Christian proselytizers are orders of magnitude worse than the modern orthodox kid in school who wore a kippah.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's not secularism, that's authoritarianism. I wish my country wasn't becoming fascist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Out of curiosity, how do other groups like sikh handle it? If I understand correctly sikh men must wear a turban and a dagger. Do they simply not do this until they are out of school?

Obviously

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So Christians are just less annoying than Muslims? And they should leave if they don't like it here?

Spoken like a true bigot. And you were trying so hard to convince others it's got nothing to do with Islamophobia. Just can't stop yourself, can you?