this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
139 points (97.9% liked)

News

23276 readers
4652 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For decades, runaway Medicare spending was the story of the federal budget.

Now, flat Medicare spending might be a bigger one.

Something strange has been happening in this giant federal program. Instead of growing and growing, as it always had before, spending per Medicare beneficiary has nearly leveled off over more than a decade.

The trend can be a little hard to see because, as baby boomers have aged, the number of people using Medicare has grown. But it has had enormous consequences for federal spending. Budget news often sounds apocalyptic, but the Medicare trend has been unexpectedly good for federal spending, saving taxpayers a huge amount relative to projections.

The reason for the per-person slowdown is a bit of a mystery. Scholars have been arguing about it for years, but no one seems sure enough to confidently predict whether it is likely to stick around for much longer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Could it have something to do with hundreds of thousands of the sickest boomers dying suddenly a few years ago?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, this trend started over a decade ago. Here are some possible explanations from the article:

Some of the reductions are easy to explain. Congress changed Medicare policy. The biggest such shift came with the Affordable Care Act in 2010, which reduced Medicare’s payments to hospitals and to health insurers that offered private Medicare Advantage plans. Congress also cut Medicare payments as part of a budget deal in 2011.

...

Older Americans appear to be having fewer heart attacks and strokes, the likely result of effective cholesterol and blood pressure medicines that became cheap and widely used in recent years, according to research from Professor Cutler and colleagues. And drug makers and surgeons haven’t developed as many new blockbuster treatments recently — there has been no new Prozac or angioplasty to drive up spending. (Medicare is currently barred by statute from covering the new class of expensive anti-obesity drugs.)

Parts of the health system appear to have become more efficient, as medical providers have been more cautious about adopting new therapies without much evidence, and more care has shifted outside hospitals into cheaper settings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Most (all?) insurance plans that charge copays for medications will give heart-related medications for free because of the cost when things like high-blood pressure our not treated.

This is both great and sad news if true. Great that it's made a big difference in the quality of later life and sad that it's largely preventable and yet nothing was done, and that there is still so much to improve with our health care system.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Considering that this is a trend that started a decade ago, probably not nearly as much as you seem to think.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Covid: "I'm doing my part!" o7

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Looking at the graph, no.

The change appears to start roughly in 2010. It could possibly be ACA related. During the many attempts to repeat it the CBO estimated doing so would drastically increase medicare spending.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

No, it's spending per person.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering the change in trend started a decade before that

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TFW you don't even bother to look at the chart, let alone read the article

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I am not able to read the article.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Not to mention even bother to read the article’s summary that’s available right here in the comments SMDH

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Future right-wing headline: "COVID vaccinated retirees cost Medicare more money"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe Ivermectin not being covered has them all seeking coverage out of Medicare?