this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
187 points (98.4% liked)
GenZedong
4294 readers
87 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
US is one of the largest countries in the world and it can accomodate more housing than China could able to. Note : Russia still has 87 percent ownership rate ๐คฃ
What's your point?
US has a lot of good terrain to build, unlike china that has a difficult terrain to build on.
i think his point is that usa can very easily provide housing for everyone but it chooses not to.
This post is not about homelessness, but home ownership.
spoiler
Yeah?
I dont understand the point of your comment. Also it reads overly antagonistic
well, if u are homeless, perhaps we can infer that you don't own a house ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
No relation between the two, surely