Yeah. One 800$ hamas rockets costs Israel 80k$ for their iron dome equivalent. It is way costlier for them. However, unlike the comment I replied too, I don't think Israel will run out of people.
Maybe they will stop advancing once there are 'too many' casualties. But this will be way fewer than death people in Gaza.
I don't think that there are no idf who just love to kill Palestinians. And with the way better equipment it is sadly not easy for one soldier to murder many many civilians.
I really don't think the civilians have any chance if Israel escalates further.
How many idf soldiers have been killed? I guess way fewer than the >8000 death Palestinians.
And yet the electricity production in Germany from coal is lower than last year.
I had hoped that this community is more skeptical of thatcher economics.
Beijing had set a target for 58GW of installed nuclear capacity by 2020, but as of September 2023 is just short of this with a combined installed capacity of 57GW, and 24 units under construction with a total installed capacity of 27.8GW, according to CNEA.
So every unit is a little over one GW? Sounds good, but their plans is to only have 18% nuclear by 2060, so it seems that won't be their most important electricity source.
I don't think that nato would pack up their bags when Ukraine looses. Nato lost no soldiers just equipment. A more realistic scenario would be a new us president (or trump again) that decides that this much spending abroad is stupid.
And Europe alone right now does not give enough weapons to Ukraine for the war to continue indefinitely.
This post is not about homelessness, but home ownership.
What's your point?
If wages stay stagnant, then yes.
If the average pay would rise faster than inflation it does not seem too bad. If the pay shrinks faster than deflation however it would be bad.
Yes, and no. There are different subspecies/cultivars that have been breed by humans. Some are specifically breed for green, others for black tea.