It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
People are replying to his comment by saying they're gonna put his approval of them on their resumé.
The wiki page can currently be summed up with "Hamas is responsible because the US says so."
Even if we accepted your terminally muh both sides-brained argument that there are two competing propaganda efforts, one of them is backed by the full force of the Western media.
So? Yes that’s one side. What, because the other side isn’t, it’s more believable?
The side being genocided is generally more believable than the side doing and supporting the genocide.
And the first side I'm talking about here are the Palestinian civilians and medical staff who have described their personal experiences of being bombed by Israel.
One side has a vested interest worth billions of dollars.
That doesn’t make the other side more believable.
yikes.. just gonna double down on it now huh? might wanna just head back to libland