It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
People are replying to his comment by saying they're gonna put his approval of them on their resumé.
The wiki page can currently be summed up with "Hamas is responsible because the US says so."
Mate you’re missing the point. You might trust these sources, but to me they have absolutely no reputation. You may as well post a video of the drunken ramblings of your local homeless guy.
Anyway I was initially responding to a link to a thread from a Washington Post journalist, have seen the Al Jazira video analysis. It’s all inconclusive.
What has a reputation to you then? Seems to me like you're willing to dismiss the perspective of non-Zionist Jews entirely with a single remark.
Here’s a news website https://truecrimenewsweekly.com/ that’s main concern is Australian Politics do you trust it?
This is obviously a deflection and I don't know anything about Australian politics, but glancing through the site they seem surprisingly based.