582
My 1070 is still going strong
(startrek.website)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
582 points (98.8% liked)
memes
8761 readers
2491 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The only game that I'd considered playing that my build couldn't run was Starfield. Seems like that worked out for the best.
You ain't missing anything in that front.
It’s not that bad, Jesus.
I didn't say it was bad. Just that you're not missing anything if you don't play it. Where do I say it's really bad?
Nah, but it isn't that good either. It's very much mediocre and would have to be as revolutionary as Bethesda claimed it would be to justify the ridiculous hardware requirements.
Everything it does other games do better.
Space travel and exploration (space and ground, seemlessly), as well as space combat? Elite: Dangerous.
Story? Literally anything.
Combat? Damn near any shooter made in the last 20 years.
Dungeon looting? Just play Fallout 4, which has plenty of issues but none as bad as Starfield.
It's not bad. It's just not good at anything. I have no reason to play it over so many other games. It feels like it doesn't know what it's supposed to be, so it doesn't do anything well or interesting.
I haven't played Starfield. But that was pretty much what I felt playing No Man's Sky.
In my opinion, having played both at launch, it's a pretty similar experience, except I could see what NMS wanted to be. It wanted to be an exploration game. It just didn't have any systems to make that interesting.
Starfield doesn't want to be an exploration game I don't think, but it does have things to explore but it never makes it interesting or necessary. It's sci-fi, but that genre is supposed to be used as a lense to look at real-world issues, and it doesn't critique anything except maybe saying pirates are bad. None of the companions are interesting enough to care about, and they're almost all identical, so it isn't about them. The looting gameplay is pretty bad where you just do the same five dungeons over and over, so that obviously wasn't a priority. I just can't think of a single thing it actually makes important to the experience, so I don't know what it's trying to be.
I upgraded my PC for that, so yeah just be glad you weren't that stupid. Oh well, at least baldurs gate looks shiny now.
I upgraded for freaking Hogwarts Legacy...
But hey, it prodded me to pick RDR2 back up and beat it, so it wasn't a complete waste.