the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
view the rest of the comments
Yes water is a basic human need. So it's most important. However, real free cannot exist. In the Netherlands, a country that is quite social, water is not free. We have some of the purest tapwater the world knows. People work for that, big systems have to purify that water and in turn need to be maintained. It's expensive. I don't mind paying for water if it gets me the best quality water in the world, from my tap. It's not expensive, in fact it's cheap. If this becomes free to me, I think that quality wil suffer.
Then again. I live in a country that values human life and doesn't slave away for capitalism completely.
Except everything you've said is true of public roads and those are somehow free. Literally nobody is talking about this straw man of "true free". Nobody thinks that potable water can be created, regulated, and distributed without the labor of many people. However the example of public roads, public schools, etc, show us that it is actually very much possible for essential services to be funded out of general taxes and be free and openly accessible.
Moreover, water access activism isn't necessarily even about drinking water in many places because agricultural water sources are being tapped unsustainably and distributed unfairly. Especially for indigenous peoples who rely on already precarious water sources to make their remaining land habitable, this has never been an issue that can be solved by going to the mall to fill up your drink bottle.
It’s not “waaah why is it not literally free” and it’s weird that chuds on the internet interpret it that way.
The complaint is not that it isn’t literally free. The complaint is that their water system was destroyed.
“Water is a human right” isn’t about a few cents for tap water. It’s a demand for water systems to be protected and not exploited with disregard for the impact of that exploitation.