this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
548 points (88.9% liked)

Political Memes

5506 readers
2026 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m the chimney sweep now!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago (8 children)

But we already got rid of child chimney sweepers without getting rid of capitalism

[–] Cethin 64 points 10 months ago (18 children)

The point is that capitalism prioritizes profit, not the welfare of people. This is only not done anymore because of regulation, not because capitalism was fixed. It can't be fixed. The target goal of capitalism is wrong. Profit does not optimize for innovation, welfare, happiness, or anything else that could be called good. It will always exploit people as much as it can, and it just happens to not exploit children (in the western world (legally)) because we made it not allowed, and disobeying that law would be less profitable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Seems like regulations are the fix.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Capitalism is unsustainable by design, there is no fix to that

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (6 children)

shouldn't we come up with a system where the core values don't need regulation. it becomes unthinkable to exploit children not because of regulation and enforcement but because the system in itself denies power to exploiters.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Is there any system besides capitalism with regulations we have in developed countries without child labor? Child labor existed in the Soviet Union and in communist China. Historically the idea that children should not perform labor is very recent.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry give some states a couple of years and I'm sure we'll see child chimney sweepers come back 😉

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago

Businesses in the Midwest US have already been hiring 10-12 year old undocumented kids to work overnight cleaning machine parts at meatpacking plants. I mean… so many different things wrong with that. The psycho fuckers who run these businesses need some real penalties, like jail time and dissolving their company.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We just got rid of chimney sweeps in general.

Despite us regulating child labor it seems like profit motives and greed overpower regulatory measures.

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/26/1157368469/child-labor-violations-increase-states-loosen-rules

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What about all the places where it has been made illegal and will remain so?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

At one point they probably said it would remain illegal in the places they're trying to legalize it.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Through labor organization. It wasn't out of the goodness of the hearts of benevolent Capitalists, but through struggles of Workers. The point of this picture isn't that Capitalism used to be worse, and fixed itself, but that Capitalists will absolutely take advantage of children and subject them to sacrificing their bodies for clean chimneys if it makes a profit.

The takeaway from this is that Capitalists cannot be seen as individual humans with values, but as cogs in the Capitalist machine that will exploit everything and everyone for profit. An individual Capitalist may not be willing to go that far, but inevitably as long as there is profit to be made, someone will fill that gap.

That's why economic systems need to be looked at at aggregates and not as individual transactions. You miss the forest for the trees.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

Now we only have child miners, child slaughter house workers, child assembly line workers, child scrapyard garbage collectors, ...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

we just moved child labour to less developed countries. we didn't get rid of anything. you just don't see it, but child labour is still going strong in the world. child slavery as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (10 children)

No WE did not. The people in those countries where it still happens allowed it to still happen.

None of us have any decisionmaking power to control what those countries do, so the burden to fix those problems is on those countries who allow it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's 100% a consequence of Capitalism, though. You're blaming developing nations for the willful exploitation international Corporations commit and you personally benefit from.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

That's just your opinion. The fact is that those developing nations should have child labor laws in place, and proper enforcement of those laws to prevent children from being exploited. The blame belongs squarely on those who allow it, and I reject any personal responsibility for any of that because I have no control over the laws of any country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (7 children)

It is not my opinion that international corporations brutally exploit the third world, it's a fact. It is also not my opinion that Capitalism leads to this, the profit motive inevitably leads to it.

You claiming that developing nations should just fight against international corporations brutally exploiting them and absolving yourself of any responsibility you have for it is just sticking your head in the sand. If you aren't boycotting Nestlé, you're supporting them.

The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism. You individually cannot do much, except protect, organize, and try your best to support less unethical companies whenever you can. However, to blame developing countries for corporations knowingly brutally exploiting them and offering no alternative is absolutely baffling.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Are you 14? You don't seem to understand how global trade works

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Yeah those countries just need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and start being productive members of the world.

I know we could help them out so they don't have to go through all the hard times alone and without the knowledge we have, but fuck em hahahahahaha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But we are sharing knowledge and sending both aid and capital there. A lot of the countries are industrialized to the degree they are with the capital. Nobody acts in a vacuum these days.

We could be doing more for sure but we're not doing nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes and there is no other child labour anywhere in the world at all anymore

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think they're saying that things can improve even within capitalism. And they have. But child labour still exists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Sure, things can improve. Unfortunately it doesn't often go that way.