this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23328 readers
150 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How many times I've been told "It's okay if its Google because at least it isn't the government!"

Fucker they will sell it to anyone who pays. Including the government.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

iirc google don't sell data, they only buy it. which makes sense considering they run their own advertising network. why would they help other networks? and they're already embedded at some point into everyone's lives, wether iphone, android, Google search engine or not. as for the government getting the data: google legally have to comply with information requests or gag requests from the USA government, as that's where their datacentres are mostly based as well as their company itself.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

google legally have to comply with information requests or gag requests from the USA government

Just because it's legal doesn't make it better. Slavery used to be legal

And sure, they don't directly sell the user data but they'll use it in any way possible for their ad customers to target and profit off of you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

yea ik it's not right, I never said it was. but they still have to comply with law whether they want to or not if their home country.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

If they're giving away the data of their users to be allowed to continue operating and profiting in the country, they're selling data

You're taking it too literally. Working for a company is also referred to as selling your labor

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

that's a fair point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

selling data in the article is referring to actual advertising data transactions on the "marketplace" or whatever. You're expanding it to mean something more nebulous.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh my apologies, the ruthless corporation said it doesn't do it, so it must be true.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

doesn't make sense for them to sell data though. they're such a big company with so many competitors in literally any space. why would they bother selling it when they can just buy it, hoard it to make their own network stronger?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

they make enough money from their own data collection, selling it would actually end up LOSING them profit as that money would go to other advertising agencies.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

they make enough money

You're expecting a private company to stop at "enough"?

selling it would actually end up LOSING them profit as that money would go to other advertising agencies.

They do both.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They literally don't. I don't know why you feel the need to infer some super secret financial transactions. The article is talking about "above-board" financial transactions on ad data marketplaces. Any data transferred to the US government is using their other programs which probably are more convoluted than just handing over money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I never said it was secret

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

This has some strong “Trump’s already rich as we know he isn’t going to try to turn a profit on the presidency” energy