this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024

206 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13483 readers

883 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

206

RIP @InevitableSwing (hexbear.net)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 100 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Uh, oh. What was the vote? Do I want to know?

---

Edit

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh! A sharp concurrence!

[–] [email protected] 45 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It was unanimous to put him on the ballots

[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf'ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I have never read a harder cope sentence than "sharp concurrence". Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I like etymology and looking things up. But I don't think I even did a quickie google of the judge/justice use of "concurrence" because legal shit can be so tedious.

---

Nina edit

TIL - there's something even more lib than a "withering dissent". A "sharp concurrence" is the most lib thing possible. I thought a concurring opinion might be complicated. Nope. It's very simple.

Concurring opinion

In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"A sternly unpleasant glare" dennis-stare

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sotomayor Raised an Eyebrow after EVERY Ruling by Supercilious plays.

---

supercilious [] Etymology: early 1500s from Latin superciliosus "haughty", from supercilium "eyebrow".

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

But they agreed dissidently!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

RIP in peace old friend

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I better become a malevolent ghost so I can haunt Israel or there will be hell to pay!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Anyone know any good necromantic rituals?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

juche-rose how do we not have any juche necromancy emojis with all the fucking memeing we do about it

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Sometimes we must be the change we want to see in the world

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I was honestly gonna guess 7-2 or something like that, with the dissenters arguing about how being impeached should impact legal ability to run again or something similar and technical, but without real standing

Liberals continue to be more pathetic than expected

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ain't that the dems in a nutshell. "you're doing exactly what we would do, but too much and too loud!"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The rollin' coal Trump Train leads to fascism.

The Trump Train with the lib caboose also leads to fascism. But it's important to recognize that it's a diesel and it goes slower. Also the libs want Americans to know they are working as hard as they are able are to get permission to paint a rainbow flag on their train car.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm pretty sure diesel trains are faster than coal trains. After all, Hitler didn't actually win any elections; he was appointed by Paul von Hindenburg.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

"Sharp concurrence" lol

Cannot write a more succinct and damning summary of democrats and libs in general

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

I didn't know "scathing dissent" had an even worse sibling.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I entirely forgot about concurrences. I have a TIL comment lower in this thread - https://hexbear.net/comment/4663388