this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2021
3 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15881 readers
506 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

If no money was exchanged for this, people would treat it as the crank bullshit it is

critical support to whatever marketing department scammed pepsi out of millions of dollars for the corporate logo version of the timecube manifest

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Given that so many logo redesigns cost huge amounts of money and end up being some minor change like this, I do wonder whether this isn't just kinda a standard thing to have pages of grandiose nonsense to justify paying millions for a change of font or whatever, and this was just the unfortunate one that got leaked

But yeah, absolutely phenomenal grift, it's hard not to be a little impressed

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Yes, it's grift that helps insulate branding/marketing/executives from any negative consequences of the logo change.

If they paid 2 million dollars they can say the problem was their consultant, or that they just couldn't have known, they did their best or whatever.

If they paid the same guy to make the same logo but they paid him $30,000 to spend half a year drafting logo proposals back and forth, then their ass is more firmly on the line when people drink 3% less pepsi the next year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

I particularly like the ones where they go through and spend millions on the redesign and millions more updating all their stationary and signage etc etc and it goes through hundreds of internal people and nobody says anything, and then the first person from the public sees it and says "that looks like a dick lol"