this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1448 readers
662 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Announcement arrives as Colorado's Senate hears a bill banning parts pairing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You need to review how you've acted in this thread.

I said Apple needs to be hit harder. You said they probably never will be. You said only consumers could help. I said that's fatalist bullshit. You've since insisted you'd never be fatalist about this... while being fatalist in literally every comment. Quoting you to prove it just makes you scoff louder.

And now you want to scold me for a tone that is largely imaginary. Listen: when I am being an asshole, I'm not fucking shy about it. I know exactly how I prod people in internet arguments. So when I tell you you're projecting, it's not some insistence I've never done wrong or been rude, it is frustration for how you're ignoring why and how I am actually giving you shit. If you're going to whinge about being hassled then the least you can do is recognize what you're being hassled about.

Adding to that list: tone policing is abuse. If I read this haranguing (aggressive cheerleader, pummeling people!) and tell you where to shove it, well, that must prove the haranguing was right! No way a middle finger is a valid response when 'calm down, honey' is lobbed at, say, one sentence expressing disinterest. Or if you'd prefer a direct quote, "take a breath, and go outside." Sure, guy who responded to my top-level comment, clearly I am picking a fight with you, by being exasperated with the shit you keep saying. Your bickering on this website is totally different from my bickering on this website.

Obviously I should bend over backwards to please you, o sainted pessimist. Arguing just makes you double down. Right? "Good luck trying to pummel people into being more optimistic." God forbid anyone try unconscionable language like "baloney" or "stop." You must coaxed gently from the ledge, with soft pillows and a lilting voice. I mean god fucking dammit, aggressive cheerleader, are you so pig-ignorant you've never heard of pessimism? The thing you're criticizing? News flash about that group you're tired of. They exist! I'm sorry we can't all live in the magical fantasy land where everything goes right forever, la dee dee da da.

Gosh, why can't you just have this dialogue with me? You seem disinterested for some reason.