this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
128 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15840 readers
572 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Liberal.world read political theory challenge: impossible!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 4 months ago (2 children)

@[email protected]

We are federated with your instance, ask us about Tibet, Uyghurs, and Putin!

putin-wink

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Xinjiang thing is incredible. Noted genocide deniers literally the UN human rights office out there denying genocides, amirite liberals?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the craziest thing is all they have to do is lessen their rhetoric and it wouldn't be as blatantly absurd. But the absurdity is the point. It cannot be "hey this is prejudiced policing" it MUST be a super holocaust. Because if China is a rational actor then there is no excuse for completely shutting out any talk of compromise or coexistence

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

Right? There are legitimate critiques to be made of abuses and unjust treatment. Rounding up random people, detaining them for months, and making them sing bad nationalist songs? Wth? And there's important questions to ask about the counter terrorism actions by states, how public safety and stability should be weighed against the freedom of the people and their agency.

And since that's all complicated and nuanced and also draws western atrocities during the GWOT in to contrast with the PRC's counter-terrorism program in Xinjiang they have to scream Genocide and fervently never learn anything about the situation.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago

Bring me in on this discussion if they appear here!

I'm no Tibetologist but goddamn you're gonna have trouble finding a person who knows more about pre-annexation Tibet than me.

I got into it with a disaporic Tibetan recently online who didn't know shit about their ancestral country's history and they were playing the ethnicity card (because apparently you can only know about a particular if your parents were born in that country?) We had a back-and-forth, they dodged all the uncomfortable questions... you know how all of that plays out. But anyway, eventually I lost my patience and dished out a long insult that was extremely specific to Tibetan history & culture and to this person's particular brand of nonsense - I knew they wouldn't understand it and that it just looked like a string of weird references but if you happened to know your shit about Tibet then it would have come off as an absolute roasting.