I'd say that's not what "abnormous" means, but I like your implied definition better.
this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
446 points (95.5% liked)
memes
10334 readers
1650 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I didn't know it was a real word and assumed OP made it as a combination of abnormal and enormous. Just looked it up though and you're right.
I feel like with enough usage, we could force the definition to shift.
I'm going to try and make fetch happen!
That’s it. I’m invoking the clause.
Prepare yourselves, millennials, we’re not done making quirky headlines yet.
Article IV § 2 of the generational edict asserts that every generation holds the unilateral right whimsically adopt cultural relics and insist without proof that they’ve always done things that way to other generations.
From now on: everything cool is fetch; it’s not a glow-up, someone has ‘become fetch’; ✘ you got that drip, ✔ you’re so fetch.
I mean that's literally how it works yeah, the dictionary just observes how people use the words, they don't define them themselves
You like it?
It's very generous.
I just think they're neat
Yes yes, “ah tah.”
Catherine McCoid and LeRoy McDermott hypothesize that the figurines may have been created as self-portraits by women.[12]This theory stems from the correlation of the proportions of the statues to how the proportions of women's bodies would seem if they were looking down at themselves, which would have been the only way to view their bodies during this period. They speculate that the complete lack of facial features could be accounted for by the fact that sculptors did not own mirrors.
Water
Yeah, I saw that rebuttal and it seemed pretty strange to me.
They couldn't have been sculpting from their own perspective, because they technically had access to viewing themselves from a third-person perspective?
We technically had access to drawing with linear perspective all along, but somehow until only a few hundred years ago, this is the best we could do:
It just seems like a very modern-biased way of thinking about depiction. Mapping objective reality (rather than subjective perception) into art is a relatively new concept.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I mean, that lady's crotch is bigger than her tits, she's not exactly proportional from any perspective. I'm gonna go ahead and say that maybe we have no idea who made it and any argument concerning authorship is pure speculation.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I've always liked me a big woman, but those ancient boys may have liked too big of a woman. Who am I to judge, though? Probably sign of a real good harvest, and I bet that made everyone horny back then.
Up until just a few decades ago the hardest thing for people to get was food, not housing as it is (for most of the people on Lemmy) today.
Because of this, being fat was seen in various societies as a sign of wealth or beauty, sometimes both. As late as a hundred years ago the US and Great Britain had "fat man societies". Here's an article on that:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/03/07/469571114/the-forgotten-history-of-fat-men-s-clubs
We can't really know why the "fertility idol" sculptures look that way, but if you're an early human spending your life going through cycles of feast and famine as you follow prey animals sticking around with the fat person you ran into was a good way to stay alive.
Maybe women used to be more gigantic back them and we're nerfed across time or something. I unno. I am no xenobiologist
They were most likely made by women, the proportions make sense when you think of a woman looking down at herself. It is just that when the first men to uncover the artifacts looked at them they said "wow, these were obviously made by men and are ancient porn!"
There are ones that have been found at various stages of pregnancy so were likely an educational tool.
Our biological weakness for an ample bosom transcends the ages.
Big booba good
"art"
Motif*
Your turkey appears to be missing it's head
The carving just looks like a whole chicken with lemons under the breast skin. 🤤
view more: next ›