this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
510 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2463 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 6 months ago (29 children)

Yup and these 60 companies are using their insane profits to lobby the government to ensure nothing ever changes.

Yay capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Lobby? They basically own government. I don’t think people realize how big business’s only fight is amongst other big business. They don’t fight with law makers, they make them.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Yes. Lobby. That is HOW corporations own the government.

They pay people off. They even plant them. Either way they are using their huge sack of cash to manipulate the world around them to their benefit.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 6 months ago (12 children)

The two tobacco companies Altria and Philip Morris International combined made up 2% of the branded plastic litter found, both Danone and Nestlé each produced 3% of it, PepsiCo was responsible for 5% of the discarded packaging, and 11% of branded plastic waste could be traced to the Coca-Cola company.

Imagine how much plastic waste could be eliminated if Coke and Pepsi just went back to glass bottles?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Imagine how much plastic waste could be eliminated if we just boycotted these companies.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (5 children)

You are going to have a much harder time convincing people to give up on their soda addiction than you are finding a way to get the soda addicts to get Coke and Pepsi to switch back to glass.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps so, alas. And the rates of obesity and diabetes continue to rise. sigh.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s the thing about addiction. You keep using even though it’s really bad for you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I did notice Altria / Phillip Morris were also in that list. :-(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I haven't had a drop of either in 20 years and the mess has only grown larger.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Really? That's strange. I could have sworn the fault was on individuals and not the companies producing these mountains of shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Well, you see, you complain about society and yet you are part of it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Don’t worry about these big guys. The straws are gonna save the planet.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Said no one ever.

People so mad about straws act like you cannot possibly work against a problem in more than a single way.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (5 children)

The problem is we are not trying multiple ways. We only try the ineffective ones to avoid trying the effective ones.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And by "we" you mean actually "corporations"? Of course they aren't willing to blame and fine themselves for saving money.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

By "we" I mean the governments we elect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Which are basically controlled by the corporations. My point is that there are many people who want to do more and several groups trying to make it happen. They aren't up against an easy fight. So when a small win happens like plastic straw bans, maybe we can want more without dismissing it as bullshit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You could always not buy their completely non essential products, but suggesting that rarely gets a good reception from the "obsessively whining about straws" crows.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (16 children)

Oh yay, blame the consumers not the ones making the trash, worked so well the past 50 years

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You could always not buy their completely non essential products

I've been trying this for decades, but it hasn't put a dent in the global growth of waste.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah you pretty much need to end Citizens United and ban corporate lobbying to even start talking about regulating correctly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's what's always a bit maddening about these conversations. It's not like companies are just shredding plastic into the atmosphere because they're cartoon villains who love evil.

They're making cheap plastic shit because we love cheap plastic shit. They're making this stuff in response to explicit consumer prioritization of low costs above all other factors. If consumers broadly demanded soda in glass bottles and expressed a willingness to pay the extra cost that this entails, every soda company would use glass.

I'm not saying that you individually should be blamed for all environmental pollution, but we have to realize that companies are responding to the exact same incentives that we do. They're obviously operating at a much larger scale, but they use cheap plastic shit for the exact same reason we do. If you're looking for policy solutions, a great option would be to introduce an externality tax on plastic so that this environmental cost is actually factored into the production and end price and can fund remediate the damage, similar to carbon taxes. Of course though, the moment you say the word 'tax' people's brains completely shut off, so this is probably a non-starter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (9 children)

I don’t think consumers in general have a direct say in the matter though, regardless of their impact. Blaming every individual for it is inefficient, and ultimately is only useful for deferring blame when you don’t want to solve the actual problem.

If you are interested in an actual solution you go to the source, and regulate the corporations.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

They're making cheap plastic shit because we love cheap plastic shit

No. They're making cheap plastic shit because their constant lobbying against common sense regulation and a living wage means that the cheap plastic shit is all most of us can afford.

explicit consumer prioritization of low costs above all other factors

Also known as a consumer prioritization of being able to survive without being TOO crushed by debt. You're really slathering the victim blaming on thick.

If consumers broadly demanded soda in glass bottles and expressed a willingness to pay the extra cost that this entails, every soda company would use glass

Bullshit. You have the power relationship backwards. The vast majority of humanity can't afford high quality sustainable packaging because the premium companies demand for it is ridiculous. Because they know they can as long as useful fools blame the consumers.

I'm not saying that you individually should be blamed for all environmental pollution

Sounds awfully close to just that, though.

we have to realize that companies are responding to the exact same incentives that we do.

They absolutely are not. A company has the option to make the packaging better at the same price in exchange for a couple cents less profit per bottle. A customer, who already doesn't have the vast resources with which to choose that a company has, would have to pay several times that, often several dollars, extra to get the "premium" glass bottle.

They're obviously operating at a much larger scale

That's like saying that the Sultan of Brunei's palace is obviously much larger than my apartment: while technically true, the difference of scale is so vast that any direct comparison is effectively meaningless.

they use cheap plastic shit for the exact same reason we do.

Nope. They produce cheap plastic shit to maximize profits because they're allowed to. We buy cheap plastic shit to minimize costs because we have to. Those are not the same reason.

If you're looking for policy solutions

Yes! This better be good..

a great option would be to introduce an externality tax on plastic so that this environmental cost is actually factored into the production and end price

Companies would just pass the cost on to consumers as always. If you do that AND price control, then we have something!

similar to carbon taxes

Another example of something that's a great idea in theory but end up not working as intended because it's too easy for big companies to avoid the intended consequences. Carbon taxes with no transferrable carbon credits and the aforementioned price control could work, though.

the moment you say the word 'tax' people's brains completely shut off,

Taxes work. You just need additional mechanisms too, to prevent the kind of fuckery companies get up to.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Yay, all the ones to their eyeballs in regulatory capture.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Again? Guyyyyyys 🙄

load more comments
view more: next ›