this post was submitted on 08 May 2024

254 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38506 readers

2703 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

254

EU agrees €3B raid on Russian assets to buy weapons for Ukraine (www.politico.eu)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Late concession by Belgium paved way for deal on using profits to buy ammo for Kyiv’s war effort.

The EU approved a plan to use the profits generated by investing frozen Russian assets to buy weapons for Ukraine.

Ambassadors meeting in Brussels on Wednesday gave the go-ahead after Belgium signaled a climbdown on the way it treats tax revenue on the cash — the last major obstacle to deal.

The profits generated by investing Russia’s assets immobilized in Belgium— where a large part of the assets frozen in Europe are kept — are worth between €2.5 billion and €3 billion per year.

all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I wish for more money but every bit counts.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Gotta start somewhere. Hopefully this opens up the floodgates.

[+] [email protected] -36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

It's a very dangerous game to play as this signals that investing in the Western monetary system means that your money can be used as a political weapon at any time. It takes away all the credibility of our banking system. Not just for Russia but also for China etc.

That was also the reason that until now we only froze the Russian assets and didn't seize them. And it seems like this is only a seize of yearly profits, not of the actual assets.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not just for Russia but also for China etc

Good, everyone should know that Europe doesn't fuck around with Countries that commit war crimes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Good one dude

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Give them time. They have baggage and jumping too soon could be problematic.

Good pic choice for your reply.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The major underlying issue here is that it is not about war crimes as you stated. In fact war crimes have absolutely nothing to do with this as proven with a single image.

It is about using money as a weapon.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Yeah this comment is flagrantly ignoring the fact that Russia is an agressor that is invading a country and committing genocide and threatening nuclear war.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are just using the interests that this frozen capital generates and using that (instead of continuing to pay the interests to the Russians).

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know a thing about that but isn't it just stealing money? And if they are already stealing money why not steal all of it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

They are not taking away any money from the existing funds. And that is the important thing IMO. Rather, they are using that large amount of money and investing it (safely) so that they generate surplus money that they use. Hiwever, they arent taking away money that is currently there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, freezing, doing anything other then leaving it alone does that to some degree.

My bigger concern is that l'd rather Russia's funds be used for reconstruction.

I think that it will be easier to get political support for weapons in grant form than for reconstruction. Ukraine's going to need both.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Houses for people to return to and safe drinking water don't advance strategic goals*.

*actually they do if you want stability & peace but those aren't the real goals of geopolitics

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm not saying that governments will necessarily take issue.

I'm just saying that that has to also get past publics and their representatives in legislatures.

I'm not saying that it's impossible to do -- people have called this a "Marshall Plan 2.0", and the original was -- ultimately, though not as initially presented -- both done and overwhelmingly grants. But my point is that if Russia isn't actively-invading a country in Europe, I think that it's gonna be harder to get the political momentum for funds than if Russia is doing so.

And we're not talking pocket change -- it's hundreds of billions. Russia's frozen funds are already in the hundreds-of-billions, so that's a significant chunk of that covered already.

I'd rather have the more-difficult-to-raise-money-for things have the easier-to-get money aimed at them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

It takes away all the credibility of our banking system.

Which is a win for China and BRICS

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Poetic justice, taste of your own medicine

[–] auzas_1337 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why do I keep reading the comments on shit like this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do I dare to ask what you mean? Tankies?

[–] auzas_1337 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much, yeah. It’s just sort of depressing seeing what people think(?) and then spend their time writing.

When it comes to Russia - Ukraine war, I think people outside of Russia’s doorstep have really weird, theorethical, warped perception of what it means and how it impacts the region.

It can probably be said about most wars, the people the closest to it are the most aware of the nuances, history and reprocussions of it, but since this is such a high profile, global system shaking war, a lot more people feel like pitching into the conversation and from what I see in the comments under articles like this, the people who decide to leave a comment either haven’t lived under authoritarian rule or haven’t lived in a post-authoritarian rule society.

I’m trying to choose my words carefully here because I don’t want to bash communism and make it seem inherently opressive, although I think there are better socialist alternatives to communism.

So what I mean is, I get bummed out when I see comments that feel completely detached from reality and I should just stop reading the comments under these threads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, people who don't remember what communism actually did somehow hate reading about it, except some cherry picked slogans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Ambassadors meeting in Brussels on Wednesday gave the go-ahead after Belgium signaled a climbdown on the way it treats tax revenue on the cash — the last major obstacle to deal.

“The money will serve to support #Ukraine‘s recovery and military defence in the context of the Russian aggression,” the Belgian government, which holds the six-month rotating presidency of the EU, said in a message on X, formerly Twitter.

The initiative is separate from a wider-ranging push by the U.S. to confiscate the assets in their entirety to support Ukraine, a move that is being rejected by the biggest EU governments over fears about legal and financial-volatility repercussions.

The tax income amounted to €1.7 billion in 2024.This comes after the U.S. and several EU countries — led by Germany — heaped pressure on the Belgian government to hand over the cash to Ukraine, as POLITICO first reported.

In another last-minute concession, Belgium also reduced the fee that Euroclear will charge for handling the frozen assets to 0.3 percent — freeing up extra cash for Ukraine.

The latest text of the EU plan offered neutral countries, such as Austria, Ireland, Malta and Cyprus, the chance to opt-out from buying weapons — possibly securing their backing for the deal.

The original article contains 485 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!