this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1253 points (99.2% liked)

Memes

8303 readers
617 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ubermeisters 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Is that the engineers fault? Or is that the people who are supposed to check for usability after the engineer is done designing the functional aspects? Because it's not usually an engineer's job to do this...

Basic product testing is the foundation of manufacturing, an error like this doesn't get all the way through production and it still be just the engineers fault.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They probably reused a PCB from another model that used a paperclip hole reset. They duplicated the design, sent it for testing, and came back with "everything is great, but make the reset a push button before you ship it." Engineering probably said "ok. But it will need to go back for usability testing" and sales said "fuck that, send it"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Or another possibility, after proto and lots of testing: "we need to move test button a couple of cm to the right, away from the corner. No further tests needed"

[–] Ubermeisters 3 points 1 year ago

That seems highly plausible to me

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it is the engineers fault, but even then there should have been multiple people that should have caught such an issue along the way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As an engineer, I agree.

You cannot be a layer of security if your attitude is, "this is someone else's problem".

The swiss cheese model of security is what I go by. Yes, no one is perfect, but that's precisely why every single person needs to actually give a damn. (and why people should be paid enough to care) The more layers of protection from catastrophe, the better.

Giving in because others are involved is literally Bystander Effect-ing your job effectiveness. Only idiots should be OK with, "this is someone else's fault."

No, this is also other peoples' fault, but make no mistake: the engineer is on that list.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Probably both, but you're right, there's definitely a qa problem here

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's very strange engineer, if he doesn't aware of RJ45 connector form-factors.

[–] Ubermeisters 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey I'm not absolving the engineer for not doing basic interference checks but I'm saying it's also somebody else's job I'm sure, Cisco's not a small company.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the point of mentioning that it's someone else job too?

[–] Ubermeisters 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the point of putting it all on the engineer?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who's putting it all on the engineer?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It literally says "at least you're not the Cisco design engineer..."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And? It showcases engineer fault, but how do it shift all blame to him?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds exactly like something an engineer would say.

[–] Ubermeisters 3 points 1 year ago

Engineer-adjacent haha

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some mistakes make you want the person responsible fired, but some mistakes are SO bad that you actually feel sorry for them instead. This falls into the second category.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's because a flaw like this is the result of SYSTEMATIC failure, not any one person. Who reviewed these designs? Who was responsible for usability testing? Who reviewed those plans? Was usability testing even performed?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Was usability testing even performed?

If it was, it wasn't tested with every cable type or they would have discovered this issue.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Some places don't fire unless the issue is repeated, client-facing, or willfully dangerous (like assaulting co-workers). The theory is: This is the first time this has happened - we learned from it, the engineer specifically probably learned from it. This won't happen again.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

did they change careers after that? I would want to work on a farm and touch grass every day with my new friends, the animals.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

/r/crappydesign

Oh wait, this isn't the Reddit anymore.

Did I do that right?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Exclamation mark denotes the community, so:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

The @ is the username indicator, so you've pinged people whose usernames are those for the instance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is one of those double edged sword things with Lemmy, since there's so many places a community can be, they all end up being a little smaller. There's got to be a better solution for that. Maybe when creating a community there should be a way to automatically search a large portion of committed all at once and display it to the user.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

What's needed is the ability to create and share 'meta' communities. A group of smaller communities can then loosely appear as a single larger community. Users can still drill down to the individual sub comunities, if they choose to. A little bit like a recursive federation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This reminds me of Macintosh computers from the late '80s/early '90s. The disk drive had no physical eject button and the power button for the computer was a big knob sticking out right below the disk drive. Coming from the PC world, it took me a couple of days to learn to stop turning off the computer every time I tried to eject the disk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah the "hilarious" obligation to drag the floppy to the trashcan to eject it.

So intuitive...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Til.. Sounds actually hilarious

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah maybe it was but it sure wasn't intuitive!

Is it going to erase my floppy? No just eject it...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Ofc it's Cisco

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

that's how you reset a product line

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Was there a recall? I remember them sending out an advisory of the default behavior (and how to disable it), then changing the default behavior in software.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I actually, legitimately, laughed out loud at this one 🤣

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cisco and Juniper need to die as entities like 5 years ago. They're single-handedly holding back all of networking from entering the modern era of computing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Care to elaborate? Sounds like an interesting story.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly can't elaborate too much as I was only a junior network guy at best and it's been a few years since that. But coming from a world of infrastructure as code and CI/CD deployment strategies, the shit we had to do to manage changes on Cisco and juniper switches was ridiculous. It was like stepping back into the stone age.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Sounds more like arrogant ignorance

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You must not work in enterprise IT. Every lower level network engineer says this until they gain more skills and experience with them. Then they realize the full extent of features Cisco and Juniper support that others don't

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Surprising opinion, I was only a junior in my brief stint at networking but all my seniors shared this opinion.