this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

History

23118 readers
35 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vietnam under Chinese rule or Bắc thuộc (北屬, lit. "belonging to the north") (111 BC–939, 1407–1428) refers to four historical periods when several portions of modern-day Northern Vietnam was under the rule of various Chinese dynasties. Bắc thuộc in Vietnamese historiography is traditionally considered to have started in 111 BC, when the Han dynasty conquered Nanyue (Vietnamese "Nam Việt") and lasted until 939, when the Ngô dynasty was founded. A fourth, relatively brief, 20-year rule by the Ming dynasty during the 15th century is usually excluded by historians in their discussion of the main, almost continuous, period of Chinese rule from 111 BC to 939 AD.

The four periods of Chinese rule did not correspond to the modern borders of Vietnam, but were mainly limited to the area around the Red River Delta and adjacent areas. During the first three periods of Chinese rule, the pre-Sinitic indigenous culture was centered in the northern part of modern Vietnam, in the alluvial deltas of the Hong, Cả and Mã Rivers.

Elements of Chinese culture such as language, religion, art, and way of life constituted an important component of traditional Vietnamese culture until modernity.

Periods of Chinese rule

First Era of Northern Domination: 111 BC–AD 40

The first period of Bắc thuộc is traditionally considered to have started following the Western Han's victory in the Han–Nanyue War. It ended with the brief revolt of the Trưng sisters.

Second Era of Northern Domination: AD 43–544

Chinese rule was restored after the Trung sisters' rebellion. The second period of Chinese rule was ended by the revolt of Lý Bôn, who took advantage of the internal disorder of the waning Liang dynasty. Lý Bôn subsequently founded the Early Lý dynasty, with the official dynastic name "Vạn Xuân" (萬春).

Third Era of Northern Domination: AD 602–905

The Sui dynasty reincorporated Vietnam into China following the Sui–Early Lý War. This period saw the entrenchment of mandarin administration in Vietnam. The third period of Chinese rule concluded following the collapse of the Tang dynasty and the subsequent defeat of the Southern Han armada by Ngô Quyền at the Battle of Bạch Đằng. Ngô Quyền later proclaimed the Ngô dynasty.

Fourth Era of Northern Domination: AD 1407–1428

Vietnam was brought under the control of China following the Ming dynasty's defeat of the short-lived Hồ dynasty. The fourth period of Chinese rule ended when the Lam Sơn uprising led by Lê Lợi emerged successful. Lê Lợi then reestablished the Đại Việt kingdom (大越) under the new Lê dynasty.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Ancient Egyptian paintings are essentially cubist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Love it when Twitter leftists retweet uncensored snuff to your feed 😍

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I still don't really understand why antennas work blob-no-thoughts

Or what AC voltages people drive antennas with... can you get a shock if you touch one under certain conditions? Can an antenna short to something and pass dangerous current?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Watching Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. I love Guy Ritchie's old gangster movies. It's all in the word play, the extremely fast, clever quips and dialogue laden with slang that, I would venture to guess, probably wasn't actually used in the late 90s London underworld. There's probably some kind of effortpost in contrasting Ritchie's movies with quippy post Whedon movies. It creates a word where everyone always has the perfect come back and rejoinder, and it's all extremely dense and clever. I love it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I feel like i should make something to go with this leftover barbecue i made but all i got is corn and black beans. The corn is easy I'm gonna roast that shit (i might try to season it like elote) bit idk about the beans. Why don't people make baked beans with black beans if baked beans are just barbecue seasoned beans

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Should we have a feminism comm? thinking-about-it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

spoilers for this week's Dr Whosoypoint-1 Wales soypoint-2

This episode is a hard one for me to pin down my feelings on.

I'll start with what I liked:

They perfectly captured the lost tourist wandering into a Welsh pub thing early on in the episode. Everyone in there just immediately pranking Ruby with a made up local legend.

Once more I appreciate the episode didn't begin immediately apocalyptic in its stakes.

The writers seemed less insistent on holding the viewers hands and trusted people to get that the Primeminister that the Doctor says brought Britain to the edge of nuclear war is the same one who's election material is everywhere. No sudden cuts back to dialogue from earlier in the episode this time.

In terms of how scenes were shot, I enjoyed how they played around with depth of field and camera focus in a way that interacted with the gimmick of the episode's "monster".

But on the other hand:

The politics of this episode were a confused mess. Between shadowy secret government agency UNIT attempting to grab a woman off the street being portrayed as heroic, and the whole NATO being the thing keeping rogue states from flinging nukes around with Primeminister ap Gwiliam's plot to buy Pakistan's nukes. Powerfully LIB.

Roger ap Gwiliam is a strange one in this 'cos he's portrayed in a very liberal "great man of history" way where he's so charismatic he wins by a landslide even though he can't help but immediately swerve the conversation into how much he wants to nuke everyone every time he's interviewed, but when he's removed Dr Who Tory party stand-in (Albion) immediately returns to normal.

TL:DR - not as good as last week's episode but still a solid contender amongst recent Dr Who. I'll say this much of the series so far, even the ones I thought were meh, still captured my attention more than any from Chris Chibnall's run as showrunner.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I like to imagine the google AI answers are a mechanical turk and the guy is intentionally choosing the funniest joke answer

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hemsworth was so great in Furiosa. Its great when guys stuck doing MCU slop get to play real parts, you almost forget that they're professionals who are actually good at their jobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Furiosa SpoilersFury Road is probably my favorite film, I really liked Furiosa. It's so similar yet vastly different. It feels even more mythic than the previous films. Scenes shot like painting, unreliable narrators etc

Surprise hit was Praetorian Jack. Loved that guy. Like what if Mad Max had a 9-5 job working for a warlord and despite that was actually a pretty sensitive guy. Also, he looks and sounds a bit like comedian Tom Walker which is pretty funny. Constantly anticipating when he was going to die because he's not in Fury Road. I also like how visually similar he is to Max combined with the unreliable narrator aspects. Like does he look like Max because all wasteland hero archetypes in these oral traditions now are Mad Max? Do all leather jacketed hero figures merge into Mad Max overtime like the early myths that turned into Robin Hood?

Dementus is a great villain. Christ Hemsworth nails it. And with Immortan Joe presented as the lesser of two evils, going to love the Trump/Dementus versus Immortan Joe Biden memes later in this year.

Nice to see the videogame characters and aesthetics (Scrotus, Gastown) just inserted straight into the story no pause. I know the game was based off stuff George Miller had planned but didn't use, but it was nice.

Understanding that the best part of any Mad Max movie (Road Warrior, Fury Road) is a fight with a big truck, George packs a few of these in, the middle of the film fight where Furiosa earns her place was probably my highlight.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Oh my bad I thought this subreddit was about dick problems which were existential in nature.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I get recommended a youtube video "all Vampire weekend songs played at the same time". why do people do this? why would anyone click on it? you already know what it's going to sound like, it's going to sound like shit. we don't need to do this

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›