this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
219 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck AI

1514 readers
3 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 79 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I think the part that concerns me most is how the Washington Post and Politico were sourcing (as in, citing as reference) this AI-riddled site in their articles, which contained stolen content from those very sites in the first place.

The race to publish is causing hallucinations even in human-written content because no one can be bothered to fact check anymore, not even news publishers themselves.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The circular sourcing problem has been going on for a long time, but the modern internet has amplified it to levels of extreme absurdity. There isn't a solution because humans are inherently lazy and fact checking requires effort. When the majority of your consumer base doesn't care, then there's no financial incentive to care on the part of the publishers. Maybe I'm being too nihilistic, but that's how I see it these days.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

College students are required to cite everything and no plagiarism or bullshitting allowed, and everything must be spelled correctly.

as soon as they graduate, they go into journalism and all those rules fly out the window. apparently.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, this doesn't even seem that difficult of a problem. Students can do it, so why can't journalists?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No such thing as "hallucinations" in human-ridden content.

That's called incompetence and negligence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

LSD: "Do I mean nothing to you?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Haha understood! But I'm talking about news writing. Unless you're implying that some reporters use LSD while writing? :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Nah. The news itself is written by LSD. Cuts out the middle man of humans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Everyone thinks they're Hunter S. Thompson.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 6 months ago (1 children)

News doesn't consider itself news anymore, it considers itself entertainment. Bring back the regulations that Reagan got rid of in the 80s.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And the Telecommunications Act that Clinton signed in 96 let corporate media consolidate all of the news organizations under a small group of umbrellas, making it easier to use news reporting to push political agendas.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

That act also ruined municipal internet for decades and is why we have such shitty rural internet in most of America

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It's extremely dangerous to our democracy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

I feel like it's becoming "who will the AI idiot machine fuck over today" news time. Wait until it becomes too many to report on.