this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024

220 points (96.6% liked)

Not The Onion

11602 readers

1456 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

220

'they didnt want us posting': Furry hacker collective suspended after teasing breach of right-wing think tank (www.dailydot.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“SiegedSec account suspended,” vio wrote. “this current account will be used as a backup until a new one is set up :3.”

The entire article is worth reading for once.

top 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gay furries hacking right-wing think tanks. What a world to live in. Maybe this is what left-wing hackers should be doing? Not hacking poor saps downloading torrents, but right-wingers and their unthink tanks.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What? A good chunk of hackers are left-wing and go after authoritarian or repressive targets. I have no idea what you’re referring to unless you’re talking about the recent Korean ISP story which is so far off from your categorization.

The other option is Poe’s Law.

[+] [email protected] -31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What?

What are you not understanding?

A good chunk of hackers are left-wing and go after authoritarian or repressive targets

Wanna back that up with something?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The very existence of Anonymous, pretty much the most notorious hacker group? Could you name one instance of a left-wing hack of torrenters?

[+] [email protected] -27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was expecting stats, but OK. So North Korean, Israeli hackers, NSA, Chinese state hackers, and bunch more are all left-wing too?

Could you name one instance of a left-wing hack of torrenters?

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/23662381

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now you’re moving the goalposts. You’re saying left-wing hackers need to go after something other than torrents but you haven’t even show that happens yet. You don’t understand your linked story if you think that applies.

I think stats-wise, less than 10% of those convicted under the CFAA are right-wing. I don’t consider state actors to fall under the category of “hackers;” that’s probably a personal bias. I would want you to categorize those states as left or right and then provide stats since that’s your thing and you brought them in. You’ll also need to define where hacks for clout or cash land, since that’s a huge percentage of CFAA convictions.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago

Which goalposts am i moving?

I think stats-wise, less than 10% of those convicted under the CFAA are right-wing.

Again, no proof. Just a claim. I can think anything I like. Also that stat could also just prove that non right-wing hackers get caught more often or are worse at opsec.

I don’t consider state actors to fall under the category of “hackers;” that’s probably a personal bias

So the NSA doesn't have "hackers"? What are they then?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

How are people hired by a state always aligned with that state’s ideology, assuming that these examples are even left-wing in the first place? How is that MalwareTech guy’s botnet for personal gain spread through torrenters, which are indeed an easy vector, a left-wing hack?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wanna back that up with something?

The literal post you are commenting on

[+] [email protected] -9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So these gay furry hackers are "a good chunk" of hackers? Thanks for that scientific insight. Got any more of those? A "good chunk" of immigrants are rapists and killers ergo that makes it a majority?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You really don’t know the landscape, do you? Gay or furry hackers do, in fact, make up a significant number of security professionals. There are a ton of in-jokes about exactly this. There are several gay, furry hacking groups active at the moment, probably representing a large percentage of active groups outside of nation state APTs.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's an unsubstantiated claim that I'd like evidence for. Bring me a study that used proper methods to gather its data and I'll believe it. Simply saying "in my experience" means next to nothing. What if I spent my time in a group of right wing hackers and that's all I knew? It would be my word against yours.

This is exactly how misinformation spreads: blindy believing what some person tells you online. I'm willing to accept that most hackers are gay furries. I would be elated even. But I'm not going to just go "oh wow, thesmokingman said so, so it must be true".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve already provided you CFAA prosecutions and security professionals, both of which you can go find data on yourself. What more do you want? A third population? You want me to go link you all the data? Do I need to chew your food for you too? Every single time I provide an answer you move the goalposts further and further.

You made the unsubstantiated claim that started this thread and you are continuing to make claims that you yourself have provided no data for. I’m still waiting for you to provide real examples of left-wing hackers focusing on torrents as a vector like your original comment.

You have no idea what you’re talking about and you constantly double down. Have fun with that.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago

OK. So you can't provide any data. Noted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bring ME one. You made the claim. You should prove it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Quote which claim I made.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

this is what left-wing hackers should be doing? Not hacking poor saps downloading torrents

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Well you made the initial assumption, so you have to provide data to back that up.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Excuse me but "right-wing" and "think" should never be in the same sentence unless that sentence is "the right-wing morons tried to think, but they're too damn stupid."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Musk's website is likely not the place to go when you want to talk about your cybercrime. Hell I doubt most Mastodon servers would be the right venue for that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Revolutionaries in the 1910's through 1970's: Baddass mofos with automatic rifles and no fear of death.

Revolutionaries today: Gay dudes dressed up like cartoon animals with an internet connection.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Jokes on you, those fur suits cost thousands of dollars cause they are lined with Kevlar! /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

decades of safety research ftw

but why are they revolutionaries

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Furry twink tank breaches right-wing think tank