this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13393 readers
867 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Article published 2017. Wonder how bad it is now after the COVID smash and grab

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Indeed, must be even crazier now.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So we could probably fit them all in one big prison, huh?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

or a labor camp where they get reeducated while they repay their debt to the society :)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Large companies can only exist if they receive monopoly rents. Otherwise incumbents would be outcompeted by challengers and we'd see a convergence of many small firms with low profit margins. So yeah, its the responsibility of the government to regulate monopolization and they aren't doing it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Economies of scale are a thing, so breaking up monopolies can easily result in low efficiency. Much better is to nationalize them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, it's a major consideration when determining if a merger should happen, e.g. Krogers. Just because its more efficient doesn't mean you get consumer benefit because you should expect them to profit maximize with monopoly rents. I mean definitely +1 on nationalize them rather than let capitalism go unfettered, but I'm making a general observation that large companies can only be large because they can extract monopoly rents, rather than just a barrier to entry to match efficiencies of scale thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The government fundamentally represents the interests of the class that holds power though, and under capitalism it's the people who own the monopolies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's mostly just because the Big Three hold other people's money. All this really means is that it's more efficient for a couple organizations to manage or process all of the country's wealth/stock transactions than have tons of private individuals or small organizations do it. Of course that does make me wonder how they actually do the decision making, are the boards of directors just picked by BlackRock/Vanguard employees?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It's almost like you could have a public central bank manage finances. 🤔