this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
17 points (75.8% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3339 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gosh, what could be the motive?! Why would anyone want to shoot Trump?!

He’s never ever done anything that would make a person want to put a bullet in his head!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Except all evidence points toward in not being politically motivated. The kid searched for Biden and Trump agents.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Searching for political leaders to attack sounds pretty political to me.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not really. It’s fame seeking. He wanted attention or to commit suicide by cop. It could’ve been anyone important.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not the person you asked, and I don't agree with the person you asked, however the article does mention some circumstantial evidence.

This lack of a motive is particularly important in light of all the conspiracy theories and partisan exploitation that have filled the void. Indeed, there is a distinct possibility we may never have a clear picture of what drove Crooks, who also searched online, according to investigators, for information about President Biden’s appearances, the Democratic National Convention, and “major depression disorder.”

Ultimately, a thorough investigation of this case may show, as with many assassination attempts in modern history, that political ideology was not a driving factor. It is quite plausible that Crooks was suicidal and wanted to go out in a blaze of infamy, an act that has grown more common among disturbed and desperate young men.

Crooks was researching depression disorder which suggests he may very well have been depressed which could suggest suicidal. Since he was looking up information about both candidates, it suggests he was less concerned about which candidate shot as he was with which offered the better opportunity for success. Recent assassinations and attempted assassinations have involved shooters that were not acting out of a desire for political change, but for some other reason. Take Reagan's shooter, John Hinckley, for example. He shot Reagan because he thought it would impress Jodie Foster and she'd fall in love with him. Or former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's shooter who killed him over a grudge he had against the church Abe was associated with.

It is clearly too soon to say what his motive was, and we may never really know. It is also far to soon to dismiss any reasonable motive until there is evidence to do so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
  • Would the government release information about it being for political change, if it was?

  • If he had written a suicide note calling for action, would the government ever let us read it?

  • does a web search of Trump and Biden suggest is wasn’t political because two parties were searched?

  • does being depressed and wanting to die in a way that would be noticed automatically make it not motivated by politics?

IMO: No, to all the above.

Unless a non-biased party comes in to document this, with full access, I’m never going to fully trust what the government says about him. Regardless of the political party in charge, none of them really want this to start being a thing that happens regularly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

No evidence of planned suicide.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

What evidence?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

on accident

How rural of them.