this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
263 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59672 readers
2895 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 154 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anti-capitalist regulations, I imagine.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

Anti monopoly and regulations against anti competitive practices are cornerstones of capitalism ensuring free and fair competition.
So no, what we need is a return back to when these practices weren't allowed, away from allowing these things more than ever as we do now.
It's easy to see Russia has become an oligarchy, why can't we see it's happening to us too?
But we can't dismantle capitalism altogether, without creating an even bigger monopoly problem, the monopoly being corrupt governments like the soviet union and their 5 year plan economy, that very obviously wasn't a very good concept.

Maybe that's what you meant, I'd just not call it anti-capitalism, when regulations are for the purpose of making capitalism work better.
So just "regulation" is better.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Repubtard: HEY THAT'S SOCIALISM!!!

Except Scandinavians have more freedom, and better free market than USA.

Repubtard: BUT IT'S SOCIALISM!!!

Ehrm, they also have better freedom of speech.

Repubtard: WHAT? ARE YOU A FUCKING COMMIE?

Actually they also rank way higher on democracy.

Repubtard: WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA?

I don't, but wouldn't it be nice if everybody had healthcare, free education and social security so you didn't have to fear to starve if you got ill and lost yopur job?

Repubtard: HEY THAT'S SOCIALISM!!!

....

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ugh, my elderly neighbor was going on about how Harris was going to take away this and that, most of which I’d never heard her say or even read about her plans doing, and I said, “where did you hear that? It was Fox News wasn’t it?” He replied with, “well, what news do you watch?” I said, “it sure isn’t Fox where they lie constantly. Harris hasn’t said any of that crap … you need to get your news from multiple sources.”

We’d be a heck of a lot better off if the news agencies were held accountable for telling lies and making up stories. Yeah, I know it’s a fine line but it’s one I’m willing to walk at this point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We’d be a heck of a lot better off if the news agencies were held accountable for telling lies

Yes, other countries have that, it's called responsible journalism.
You can't just parrot some source, and claim it's reporting. You need to check your sources.
When they help spread lies, they are part of the problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 2 months ago (14 children)

All power to the users. And I do mean ALL. Complete control over cellular modems for one. Control over every little bit of hardware in the consumers hands.

That includes warranty promises, that includes schematics, source code for firmware, everything. For all current, past and future devices.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am aware of this narrative. I don't agree.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Once capitalism is dead.

Technology is great, it's just naturally being used to exploit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Taking patent, trademark, and copyright laws to what they were in, say, 1790, might be a good start.

Regard today's billionaires with the same contempt that one does of criminals.

Wait at least 5 years before buying a new computer.

Don't pay by credit card.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Don't pay by credit card.

This is bad advice for anyone with good credit and spending habits. A credit card with rewards is just free money if you're responsible with it. I haven't paid interest in over a decade and have made thousands from rewards.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yep, the rich are rich because they borrow other peoples money. 0% free interest lines are about the best discount you can get on anything. I get to make the interest while you hold the loan? Sign me up! Siri, remind me in 11 months to pay off the X loan.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 months ago (6 children)

We stop the acquisitions. We work out ways to foster innovation and protect patents only in the short term.

We need more than a couple phone manufacturers, we need more than a couple of food producers. All of these monolith mega corporations keep smaller upstarts from coming up and competing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And more than a couple operating systems. We get a lot of horrifyingly bad compatibility issues from Apple, and to a lesser degree, Google.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Unfortunately some things will IMO always remain a natural monopoly. For example good luck trying to convince developers to write their apps for all those different operating systems.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If people stopped using tech to exploit people they would stop feeling exploited by it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago

I'll be optimistic about technology when the last techbro is strangled with the entrails of the last angel investor

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The use of open, decentralized platforms such as the fediverse is one small step in the right direction at least.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FOSS / fediverse is really the only tech stuff that isn't massively disappointing as of late.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Raze Silicon Valley to the ground and start over?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No: the bad guys will build another one.

However if 250 million Americans each spent 400 hours less on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube in the next 12 months, the shareholders might have the heads of many members of those corporate boards on pikes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Break up the mega corps. Enact user privacy-by-default laws. Market dominance via "free product" followed up by bait and switch tactics should be outlawed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Baggie 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Concrete goals, and reasonable steps to achieve them.

I feel like lately we've hit a weird speculative investment period in tech, where we have a bunch of tech that's created because it can be, but not because it's needed. Do LLMs, crypto currency, or NFTs have actual uses? Very possibly, but nothing concrete enough to satisfy the bubble that formed from them.

We live in an age of unreality. Give us something achievable and genuine, we get excited. It doesn't have to be complicated, just real. Hell, I'm excited as fuck over solid sodium batteries, and that's boring as shit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

The tech sector is right now just running in hype and jumping from one hype to the next. It's a race to keep that investors throwing money at them with providing new targets to keep investors from realizing the stuff isn't that useful.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Repairable technology with encouragement to repair things that break by designing them to be fixable.

Open source technologies becoming the rule, rather than the exception (this is already the case in some ways, but I truly mean EVERYTHING).

Open Standards that make interoperability easier by removing walled gardens (iMessage, G-Sync, etc).

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Get rid of the billionaire tech-lords. The ones that create the only new tech we’re allowed to have: fees, ads, and enshittification.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m a developer posting on Lemmy so maybe take this with a huge grain of salt but I think we need to focus less on STEM/finance and more on humanities education. Definitely in the United States but probably most of the world considering India and China focus on tech too.

When I was learning to code (in the 90’s and 2000’s unless you count a 9 year old making BASIC do loops), my mentors basically all had majored in something besides computer science because there wasn’t necessarily even a computer science major available if your college didn’t have “Tech” in the name. It was a lot of hippies who spent their weekends making pottery and got into IT or software development almost by accident; it was a job to fund their non-lucrative hobby or passion.

Basically, we lost something when being a programmer became a goal and not a way to reach some other goal. I’m not sure we can return to a time when it was tinkerers and hobbyists coming to the field with different backgrounds but more creatives should learn to code and more coders should be forced to make art.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Uh, NOT put surveillance and extremely questionable AI into everything? I don’t need my toilet tweeting how healthy I am

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

We cannot even play music from a device without needing some sort of patent license, usually paid by the hardware vendor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Producing products that the users wants, and that solves tje users real problems. And not trying to make products as addictive as possible, to harvest as much user data as possible to sell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I, for one, have become a lot more optimist about Tech ever since I've replaced the closed solutions that deny me control from corporations looking to squeeze every last cent of value from me - from smartphone OSes to TV Boxes - with open source solutions were it's me who holds the keys.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Decomodify software. Refuse to respect copyright laws for software, or mandate that all software must be GPL or an equivalent restrictive license.

Make it so that all government software must be GPL, that would remove an enormous install base from corporate entities. Certain EU countries are already doing this.

If you are a public institution of any kind, you should not be using corporate, proprietary software, no exceptions.

Closed source software and hardware is largely what allowed massive corpos to take over the software and hardware scene, and it's what creates the incentive for silicon valley tech bros to create new technology solely in the hopes of being acquired for hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars by some massive megacorp.

Corpos and private equity scumbags wouldn't be interested in acquiring these companies if they knew all the code and technology was under a GPL-like license, and anybody could take that tech, modify it, redistribute it, fork it, rebrand it, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Open source.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

"AI will make all of your work obsolete, there's nothing we can do about it. Shame..."

I'm fine with losing my job, it's tedious anyway. I'm not with losing my income though. Let automation and programs do the work and share the fruit of their labor to the people. Get rid of CEOs.

Then we can talk about optimism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Automate terra forming against climate change. I want big machines and swarms of drones doing 24/7 regreening and planting forests in the desert.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

When I see technology actively making the world consistently better rather than constantly trashing the ecosystem that literally keeps us alive, I'll have optimism about it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Opensource (specifically Libre)

Worker and community cooperatives.

Right to repair.

Public money, public goods.

Privacy by default.

Decentralization > Federation > Disconnected > Centralized

Treating addiction as a disease and people intentionally seeking to exploit it at a mass scale should be charged for harm.

Organizations should be held liable for user data exposed to malicious actors both intentionally and through neglect of security.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Well first we kill all they ~~lawyers~~ Investment Bankers.

Then all the lawyers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Anarcho-transhumanism, or ig more open source innovations unsullied by the profit motive would-be nice.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Get rot economists out of tech companies and return to private ownership.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I ditched my smartphone spring of 2023. Still use it on WiFi at home, but every time I leave the house, I only carry a fliphone.

Every time a stranger asks me about it, they say something like “I wish I could ditch my smartphone.” Like I get it. It’s not easy. I can’t even go to a baseball game unless my wife has our tickets on her phone. Paying for parking sometimes requires an app.

Yet apparently everyone hates this thing that they are now required to carry around.

How did we get here?

load more comments
view more: next ›