3090 here with an ultra wide monitor and running on ultra preset, game runs fine for me π€·ββοΈ
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
141 points (97.3% liked)
games
20539 readers
222 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
-
3rd International Volunteer Brigade (Hexbear gaming discord)
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Read an article on lemmy that intel cpus have a performance issue for that game!
Skill issue
Yeah, it appears to have some issues with 2000/3000 series RTX cards. People with like GTX 970s are getting equal or better performance than 2080 Tis and shit.
Might be something to do with hardware. My friends have been getting 60-70, though Idk what hardware they have. Or drivers?
Saw the GamersNexus vid on performance benchmarks across a variety of graphics cards and I think I'll wait for a while before playing Starfield. I think the biggest problem with most games is that they aim to wow graphically and completely forget to optimize for a variety of hardware, especially PC.
load more comments
(4 replies)
30fps on all the lowest settings on a 2070 with 64gb ram and an i9-12900K.
FUCK
that's way better than my rig
god damnit, i was hoping i could play the new bethesda ~~game~~ modding platform at potato quality ;_;
It runs like assssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Pirate it and test before you drop money on this thing. I promise you the time/effort to torrent and be sure first might end up saving you regret.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Meanwhile I'm getting slightly better performance than that with a decade old computer that's just below the minimum specs lmao.
I've turned it off. Can't deal with it. It's not worth feeling sick over.
This is about the worst way to go about things. Whatβs a great game that you wouldnβt expect?
load more comments
(1 replies)
70 dollars for an ugly game that can't run right.
And has no FOV slider or texture options
From what I can gather it's both oddly GPU heavy and 2000/3000 series Nvidia cards are having a tough time, so you're in quite an unfortunate spot. Also is this with FSR? Cause that'd be a big oof
Also is this with FSR?
45 with fsr
EDIT: Nah it's 30 most of the time lmao
EDITEDIT: It's only 50 in the fucking inventory menus.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Something performs badly at launch > people complain > eventually it gets fixed by devs or community > people forget and preorder the next version, or buy as soon as FOMO hits.
Unless it gets major press like 76, cyberpunk or no man sky, it won't matter much for the company, modern captalists don't think about the long run, they want a big bonus today, and don't give a shit if the company will be dead the next year.
Also, a lot of products have bad performance at launch, especially something that depends on optimizations that may not go well with different hardware. People can just calm down and wait for it to get stable.
load more comments
(1 replies)
My husband is playing it on a 3090 and whatever the 9th-generation i7 unlocked is, with the highest settings and FSR enabled, running on 1080p. 45fps in cities which is brutal. 70-80 in typical areas. Strangely, he just tried it on the lowest settings and experienced no change in FPS, and furthermore the CPU is at 100% (good on them for multithreading!), that suggests it's likely a CPU issue. Weird then that it's running so poorly on a 12th-gen i9, that should be ripping through it.
My CPU isn't anywhere near 100% it's the GPU getting toasted to 100%.
Oddly enough power draw is only at 60% of the total that the GPU can draw, this leads me to believe that the usage is not accurate. I've seen higher power draw.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I do not understand why people try to play Bethesda games on launch. I mean, I don't understand why people play them at all, but I particularly don't understand why they play them on launch.
Even Morrowind at launch had problems. It would check to make sure you had the game cd in the drive which would cause periodic slow downs, very annoying.
its performance in terms of being good is absolute shit as well as far as i'm seeing
The year is 2784. What's left of humankind after the water wars, wildfires, rising sea levels, wet bulb events, and category 10 hurricanes of the past 700 years has managed to leave the solar system on a generation ship. The Elder Scrolls 14 has just come out after a tortured 36-year development cycle with 19 years dedicated to "rebuilding" the engine. It's a Microsoft Holodeck exclusive. You go in and the first NPC you see clips through a boulder and starts slowly sinking into the ground after clearing it while muttering to themselves about mudcrabs. The gamma setting is slightly off and there's no way to adjust it. You start to move forward and the world hitches as trees pop in mere meters before you in ultra-low LOD, slowly coming into full detail over a few seconds.
I'm never preordering a Bethesda hologame again.
The Todd Howard AI installed in your neutral implant chuckles quietly.