this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
736 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20751 readers
594 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Saving this for when people ask why I need root access on my devices.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 5 days ago (17 children)

Lol I love the "You don't need root on modern Android, it does all the things you used to root for!" People. No, no it doesn't lmao

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's generally what you hear from people who have basic use cases and simply can't fathom other people may want or need different things from their devices.

Which is fine, they don't have to understand. If stock is good enough for them nowadays, more power to them.

What I'm sick of is the condescension. This bizarre thing where they somehow think a person wanting control over a device they paid for is worthy of derision or shame.

It's like if someone who only checks their email on their laptop laughing at someone using a desktop for heavier work, for no real reason other than thinking using technology differently than themselves is silly.

That other comment is a perfect example, and indictive of this weird subculture in Android spaces that hates Google but seems to be drinking from the same user-hostile Kool aid.

Personally, I'm an odd case, in that I didn't used to root or use custom ROMs at all until recent years. Basically since Android 10, simply to get around the needless roadblocks and restore the functions I want. I was fine with stock for a long time, until Google started becoming Apple.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I would love to have this for my smart tv remote that has dedicated buttons for subscription services I will never pay for. /me heads to thingiverse to search

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Install a button remapper You can disable the buttons, or reuse them for custom actions :P

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Please provide a link to a TV remote button remapper.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

For most squishy remotes, you can disable the buttons by taking the remote apart, and putting tape on the underside of the rubber button.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago

Boomer mode

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Do you need access to the Exit button if all the other menu and guide etc. buttons are covered?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Smart" tvs pop things up for no reason sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Oooof, thankfully I've never had that happen with mine, but I've also never connected mine to the internet

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ok, now I kind of want this. I only have my PC connected to the TV, so I only need the power button, volume controls, settings and the D-Pad. A specialized cover would make hitting the right buttons in the dark much easier and also remove the ads disguised as buttons.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

I figured out my tv starts on the last used channel if it receives power after a power cut. All I need to control it is a smart plug

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Neat.

The thing that bothers me whenever I see a TV remote is that there doesn't seem to be a remote control with illuminated keys, like on a computer keyboard. That way you can see the buttons even under dim lit conditions. Also, why aren't there any remotes with a built-in battery that could be charged like a smartphone?

I don't own a TV, but I know that back in the days of bulky CRT TV's there were some remotes that could be iluminated. White LEDs weren't a thing back then, so they used incandescent lamps which drained the 9V battery fast.

Why aren't back llit and rechargeable TV remotes a thing today, especially because white LED's and batteries are quite efficient today?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Didn't this used to be common? One button glows in the dark, and if you push it a few seconds of backlight illuminate the rest of the buttons?

I swear half the remotes when I was a kid did this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

If you want rechargeable batteries, just put some eneloop batteries (or some of the cheaper, rebranded ones) in the remote. They are not like the old NiMH batteries, they hold a charge for a years.

I certainly don't want a remote that I have to throw out in a few years because the non-replaceable lithium battery wore out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

My parents still have cable. The buttons are backlit, they turn on when you pick it up and turn off when you set it down. There's also a mic button you can hold down and talk to input text by voice instead of typing on a virtual keyboard with a dpad. Not rechargeable but two AAs last for a year so why bother with a battery that eventually fails and renders the remote useless?

Even basic remotes are pretty clever now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

The box Comcast sent me that I never asked for had all the features you asked for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

We have a TV remote with a solar panel on the back... Turn it over and let it recharge.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That... is a really shitty meme that misses the point?

If you actually look at what the overlay exposes, the User still has the ability to pick specific channels, control volume, power, etc. All they really lose are the DVR (good example) and all of the user friendly stuff related to tv guides and the like (bad example).

I assume this is just AI engagement farming bullshit that someone fell for and posted to lemmy but... I would actually say it would make more sense if the overlay were almost inverted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

You also lose the ability to access the TV settings, leaving you stuck on the default settings, which is one of the reasons why most people root their phones.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What's with the number buttons being available with no "OK" or "Enter" option?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

Just enter a channel number and it will auto switch

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago

Don't make me tap the overlay.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

One is for all, the other is just the TV. It's probably a remote for a smart box or something, you can program some of the TVs commands on them, like on/off, input switching, etc... so you don't have to juggle with 2 remotes in your hand.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Yes it’s for a cable box/DVR. The Spectrum logo is for Spectrum cable, the brand that resulted from the Charter Communications purchase of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Doesn't CEC fix all of the issues requiring multiple power buttons?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

On paper, but it's pretty hit or miss IME on its implementations

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

The left one is labeled TV. The right one is probably for the DVR.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Does the clip to remove the cover has label “sudo”?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As sudo applies only for a single command, removing the cover is more like su, no?

sudo would be more if above every covered button there was a tiny hole through which you could push it with a needle or so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago
[–] 299792458ms 8 points 5 days ago

Yoooo, that is sick. I need it for my grandma.

[–] possiblylinux127 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

We need a rootless linux distro

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

ChromeOS? And MacOS? (If UNIX is good enough)

[–] possiblylinux127 4 points 5 days ago

No Linux with libre components. No having root would make a immutable distro actually immutable. You could just give permissions to daemons that the user could connect to

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›