this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
531 points (93.2% liked)

memes

10693 readers
2283 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 144 points 3 months ago (6 children)

No units -> my brain reads those numbers as ages...

Those elves are too young to be dating.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Going by which lore though. In D&D 5e, Elves reach adulthood by 100 years of age.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whichever one is funniest.

So... Keebler.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 137 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 124 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If anyone is interested, here is the original (I think):

[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 months ago (1 children)

lmao that's much more perfect than the version I posted

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think not, I like the anime version

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Anime woman looks more mad though. Like I wouldn't want to turn my back on her after the picture. Real person looks on the verge of tears. Less like she's going to kill me, therefore less attractive.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

Women: I only date TALL men!

Tall men:

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Isnt 188 cm just barely 6'2? Not 6'4.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Finally a height meme where I can understand the heights given

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What heights?

I don't see any heights mentioned.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No height, just a very old couple

[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I immediately thought they were talking about weight.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 months ago

Weirdly, I thought years. Like these were elves or something.

I've been playing too much D&D, I need to spend some time in the real world.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago

I assumed a vampire anime.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Reminds me of a Billy Crystal joke.

105 year old man and his 99 year old wife go to the judge to ask for a divorce.

"Are you sure that you want a divorce at your ages?"

"Yes, your honor, we haven't been happy for a while and it's time to end things."

"Why did you stay together for so long?"

"We were waiting for the children to die."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

6'6" (247.5 Oreo Cookies for those of you who use that measurement). My wife is 5'1" tall.

When I was growing up my mom would always say "the tall girls are going to love you!" Every tall girl I ever asked out shot me down in flames.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I am 5'5" I have been flirted with by a surprisingly high number of near or above six foot women. The weird part is that most of them have known damned well I have the emotional capacity of a irate toaster in a research facility. Also I only get that they were flirting years later.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

For anyone else using reasonable units that's 198,12 cm and 154,94 cm respectively.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (15 children)

for everyone who actually uses metric, that's 198 cm, and 155 cm respectively :)

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

that's too many significant figures

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

This post is lit because of the cm measurements.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Height in centimeters? I don't entirely get this.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 months ago (11 children)

It's what most of the world uses. Tea-ville and Yeehawland are the only two that typically use imperial still.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago

We don't even use the same type of imperial either

If France could just lie for a few years and say that they're adopting the British system, it might persuade us to finally metricise properly out of spite and I'd be extremely grateful to them

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (8 children)

In Germany, we usually express height in meters and centimeters, like 1 meter 58 or 1 meter 88.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not just tea-ville, but former tea-ville colonies also measure human height in feet and inched. And former tea-ville colonies make up a large portion of the human populace.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Height in centimeters?

Yeah, it's in centimeters. 158 cm is 0.000853132 and 188 is 0.00101512 in nautical miles, if that helps any.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Alternatively, as a smaller scale, 158 cm and 188 cm are only 0.01727909011373578 and 0.020559930008748905 football fields, respectively. Hope this helps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Yeah I had to read it twice to figure it wasn't years. And I use metric, so I know exactly how tall these two are but for some reason it didn't click on the first read

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

It would be easier if it was 1.88 and 1.56 :)

[–] AI_toothbrush 13 points 3 months ago

I think the anime picture adds to it. I thought it was about the "my witch girlfriend is actually 500 just in a childs body so its not pedophilia"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't help that they didn't state their units.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's nothing. Without a unit those are just numbers. A can of coke isn't 12, it's 12floz.

Or so my metric companions don't shit themselves in their panic-induced rage at the sight of imperial units, a coke can isn't 355, it's 355mL.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'll accept the lowercase L (in my East Coast based US education we were taught liters should also be capital L, but that seems to either be flat-out incorrect or have fallen out of fashion), but googling images of the cans shows me no space between the number and the unit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I hadn't even noticed that you didn't put a space between the number and the unit. Looking it up online, the Bureau international des poids et mesures states that a space is to be used in front of all units, except for °, ' and ". Dropping the space is very common though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

It's cool to learn the official guidelines; thanks for doing the legwork here!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

No, in feet, they're actually giants.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Practice using metric. Not kidding, as an American it’s sometimes frustrating but most things are available in metric and there is a quite large convenience factor

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

A difference of ~11" 4/5ths, or about 6' 2" vs 5' 2". 📐

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Gosh I love Edelgards design

load more comments
view more: next ›