this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
357 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59738 readers
2529 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 139 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, go on, let NVIDIA buy intel. Let them buy AMD too. What could go wrong. I love monopolies! /s

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I wonder how this guy feels when he watches everyone in the streets trying to make ends meet.

Probably feels he deserves it. :)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

He's being doing nothing but selling his Nvidia stock so I'm pretty sure he knows it is overvalued

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

He buys another leather jacket, as a treat

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know he’s in a very extreme level of this but all of us can look at people with less than us and decide how we feel about them. It’s never even occurred to me to wonder if I deserve my paycheck - it’s just mine.

Before you say it’s not the same, you don’t have his extreme, extreme wealth, remember that some people have to start their days walking several miles to fill some plastic bottles with bad water so they can wash the underwear of the guy who rapes them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Oh but surely the second such an all-powerful monopoly appears, someone will start a competing company in their garage and go on to restore equilibrium /s

[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 month ago

This is all so normal and sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Which means they're in a bubble because Nvidia's total assets (85B$) value is less than half of Intel's (205B$). I refuse to believe that the "potential for growth" of Nvidia is worth anywhere close to 120B$ in actual value even in the next 5 years. I see only two things here: either Intel is undervalued, or Nvidia is overvalued. I think it's both. When that bubble bursts it's going to hit very hard for a lot of people because it's the same thing as the other big tech companies (apple google meta etc) are all valued based on predictions and magic when the companies that have an actual intrinsic value are worth less

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Seems the strategy is clear mega short nvidia to buy super leveraged intel and hope you can stay solvent longer than the market is irrationnal

I agree this is an obvious market failure because finance bros have become detached from reality even more than usual.

AI boom is starting to smell like DOT COM 2.0.

We have not seen that much improvement since gpt4, mostly cost reduction and UI convenience.

Current AI hype is not cashable, and I say that as an enthusiast who is building 15 kilowatt inference cluster in his living room.

We already have the major improvements already and we are nowhere close to done disgesting then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Strategy unclear, I'll still Bogle HODL.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How is Intel's market cap less than their total assets?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Debt, both on-the-books and anticipated.

Intel's investments in the Titanium chipset have effectively dead-ended. They can't get below 7nm efficiently. Meanwhile, you've got companies in Taiwan, Korea, China, and Japan breaking into the 3nm and 2nm scales. To catch up, they're looking at hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars in technical debt.

Yes, they can keep churning out existing processors at huge profits in the moment. But the face value of these processors plummets with every new step in Moore's Law. This amounts to asset depreciation, which means Intel's value is heavily overstated on the basis of asset cost alone.

I won't argue that NVIDIA is overvalued. But I think the degree to which they are overvalued is often misattributed to speculation and avoids the real specter haunting the company... competition. NVIDIA's market dominance and the escalating demand for their technology means the sky really should be the limit for their growth. Demand for AI processing is at the forefront of these expectations. But a rival manufacturer capable of cutting into demand for their units would dramatically undermine their profitability.

Its the same with firms like Microsoft and Facebook and Boeing. So much of their dominance is predicated on the theory that people will never leave these walled gardens and their margins being enormous purely because they controlled a critical commodity/patch of technical real estate.

There was - incidentally - another enormous company that seemed to have the market cornered in its industry and got complacent with its R&D and long-term investment strategies... Intel.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Fear mongering articles making it seem like they are doomed and will go bankrupt after bad quarterly results were announced. Articles were probably sponsored by rich people wanting to buy Intel stock for cheap. But they won't go bankrupt because the US gov./army need Intel to stay relevant against China, and Intel is basically the only American company that both designs and fabs their own processors and that is still relevant.

That and the fact that Nvidia is over valued (they are valued at 30x the value of their assets).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup. I wager the vast majority of that is AI hype. Nvidia is the king there and in datacenter GPU compute in general, and investors are betting that Nvidia will continue to dominate and that market will continue to be relevant and grow.

I have my doubts, but as a famous economist once said:

Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you and I can remain solvent.

So I'm not putting my money where my mouth is just yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

In the same way that a normal person can have a net worth less than the value of the house they own: debt and illiquidity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Intel is lagging behind AMD and NVidia with no sign of catching up. Meanwhile NVIDIA has a monopoly on AI.

It's no wonder NVIDIA is worth far more now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Intel have shown signs of catching up by putting out a better iGPU than AMD's latest and greatest for laptop chips in certain games and most compute tasks. They've also put out one of the best laptop chips last month, they consume next to nothing while still having decent performance but go on I guess

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aren't the best handhelds using AMD iGPU's? The MSI Claw didn't exactly leave a great mark. The new Radeon 890m looks pretty killer for its power efficiency.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The cpus I'm talking about have released about a month ago, but until very recently AMD were the only good options for handhelds

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just checked the new release, you're right it's looking pretty good. The AMD variant is still ~11% ahead in many games but it's certainly much much closer than before. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZkSoXPNBpA

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Intel has made some major strategic errors and may not be able to bounce back. At least, they won't bounce back with the company looking the same as it did. Their fabs need to be spun off to an independent subsidiary--which is apparently already underway--which will eventually be spun off entirely like AMD did with Global Foundries. The remaining company focuses on engineering. The resulting company won't have the same assets, but could potentially get them back to doing good work.

AMD's chiplet design has proven to be the way to go, and Intel has been struggling to replicate it across their entire lineup. I can get into the details of how genius it is, but suffice it to say that it lets AMD be extremely responsive to changes in the market in ways that were never possible before.

So is Intel undervalued? I don't think so. The market has decided their problems are so negative that it drags down the company below what their direct assets are actually worth, and the market is probably right. However, this is not a death sentence, and there are ways that the company can go on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If this is all Nvidia stock let him try to cash out and see what happens.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The thing that bothers me when people say "oh its unrealized gains, it's not real money" is that they use those unrealized gains as collateral for loans of real money. They effectively ARE that rich.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's BS that you can borrow against it. If he did sell it the valuation would drop.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

As far as I'm concerned, that's the point at which unrealized gains should be taxed: as soon as you're using it as leverage

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You dont need to sell your stocks to access that wealth. You can use that as collateral to take loans or exchange stocks.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"unrealized gains" that you can somehow live off of indefinitely.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Elons everything comes from having overpriced tesla stock as collateral

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

"AI" technologies (in case of complex "universal" models, and not ML for narrow applications) suck for the same reason oil product based technologies suck. And that's not global warming and microplastics. That's power centralization and globalization the wrong way.

Both those enormous datasets and dedicated hardware for them are points of centralization.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

I'm so excited for the AI crash

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Crazy how quickly NVIDIA went up. I wonder if they'll crash down just as fast should the AI hype either die off or shift to other manufacturers (Intel, AMD etc.) or in-house solutions (ex. Apple Intelligence).

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I just want to get a graphics card for less than the rest of a rig combined... shits ridiculous, and AMD doesn't seem to be even trying to compete anymore

[–] Dudewitbow 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

they do compete, its just users weigh DLSS and Raytracing far more than they should, and devalue VRam in long term situations

for example a 7900 GRE cost about the same as a 4070, but more people will buy the 4070 regardless

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I definitely do like raytracing, sadly. I'm more interested in graphics and immersion in a setting/story in a game than competitiveness or ultra-high FPS. Water reflections and mirrors just look absolutely gorgeous to me.

I'm definitely strongly considering AMD regardless for my next build, as I'd like to switch to Linux fully at some point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Eh, I got an AMD GPU somewhat recently and it meets all my expectations. I'm not too interested in RTX or compute, and they have a really good value on raster performance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

Fuck you, Huang.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

No, he's not. It's only his inflated market value.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He can turn a significant chunk of this value into actual dollars, even without selling the stock. This line of reasoning that execs' worth is not what it seems to be because it's based on share value is constantly used to discount their wealth and argue against acting on wealth inequality.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Exactly. At the very least, he could go get a margin loan at relatively low cost (like 5%) compared to the tax burden of cashing out (20% or more). And that's just using publicly available numbers, a billionaire can get a lot cheaper loans than that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Both numbers are based off market value, though

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Nobodies care but okay...

(Not talking about your post, but the money of Huang)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

It would be an epic double-down if he spent his entire personal fortune to acquire Intel, taking on a large amount of stock ownership in the combined company. As if he had so much confidence in the future that he was willing to bet everything on “we’re just getting started here.”

load more comments
view more: next ›