this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
348 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3969 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Stein's campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member

Stein’s campaign manager, Jason Call, disavowed the endorsement and called Duke "trash."

That is how it is done. Unlike Harris. Who went on a parade with Liz Cheney, and praised Dick Cheney for his work after they endorsed her.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The funniest part about this is I had no idea David Duke was alive. He was the main villain of BlackKKlansman. Imagine living to see yourself get written as the villain of a hit movie.

Also, mandatory fuck David Duke and Jill Stein.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you think this reflects badly on stein ask yourself 2 questions, did he endorse her because she's also a white supremacist? Did she accept the endorsement?

The answer to the first is probably no since stein is a Jewish women so I don't think she'd get along well with all the other white supremacists who think she's sub-human. The reason he endorsed her was because she's the only one who would end the war in Gaza and fight the "Jewish lobby". If your a Zionist and believe that any action against Israel is anti-Semitic then yeah stein and Duke are the same. If you live outside that delusional world then you'd recognize dukes dislike for Israel and steins, (and most of the worlds) dislike for Israel come from two completely different values systems and world views.

The answer to the second is easier, No, her campaign rejected it and called him trash as soon as they heard about it.

So does this actually reflect badly on stein, or is this just the ravings of an insane person who's trying to elect a Jewish woman to take out his imagined grand Jewish conspiracy? Critique stein if you want but this is nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 hours ago

Didn't Richard Spencer endorse Biden in a game of 64D chess as a 5000 IQ play?

....

Still either way, Jill's an Ableist Transphobe on Putin's payroll and even if she wasn't, she cannot win a single state under the current Electoral College so she could be literally the second coming of Christ and it wouldn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 12 hours ago (17 children)

Hmm.. I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Here, I'll channel my energy into a representative comment so you don't feel left out.

"I'm not voting for her. You're free to vote for whoever you want."

"I didn't write the article."

<insert 40 paragraph spiel about fairness and lemmy always attacking them boo hoo>

[–] [email protected] 45 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

You forgot to call me “friend” and channel punchable face energy with one of these 🤗 but I’ll give you an A for effort.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Who are you referring to? I'm debating some "Harris needs to earn my vote. So it's her fault if Trump wins." idiots right now.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (7 children)

It's @[email protected]. It's always @[email protected], and it's so unbearably obvious that they should've been banned long, long ago because all they do is pollute this community with Russian propaganda. I don't honestly care at this point if they are or are not literally paid (their post/comment frequency is staggering if they aren't); it's nevertheless the effect they have. This community is objectively a worse place with them here.

Edit: Again, I emphasize without engaging with them and giving them carte blanche to spam even more: every single word that comes out of their mouth is dripping with disingenuity.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

My life got much better after I blocked that account a few weeks ago

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Sup Universalmonk where u at?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago

Please don’t summon them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

No more burnin no more hangin. From now on we will compost the bodies. #GreenHoods

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago

Ok, that's pretty funny. An endorsement shouldn't be taken too seriously (given a certain string of endorsements I don't like for Harris) but it's still really funny. Fuck Jill Stein.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I can't laugh heard enough about this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago (18 children)

Aaaaand there ya go. This is all you need to know about Jill Stein right? Because if Harris is a conservative because of Cheney’s endorsement….

Or are the rules different?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

He is not just any wizard. He is grand.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 12 hours ago

Hahahaha. Of course he did.

Can we all finally agree that supportingJill Stein is being the 11th person at the table?

load more comments
view more: next ›