this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
618 points (96.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26524 readers
3424 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I guess it’s all a matter of cultural conditioning but growing up in Scandinavia this kind of rhetoric was always associated with right-wingers and other liberals whereas “both sides” was more common for progressives and leftists. The most common I saw was the one-persons-terrorist-is-another-persons-freedom-fighter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

It's always been complicated, Chomsky famously got criticized around the world for opposing censorship of different perspectives. Censorship has always come from collectivist ideologies though.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago

There's 3 lights

[–] [email protected] 23 points 15 hours ago

The one on the left is a MAGA, they're unable to listen to logic even if the answer is right in front of them.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

I see seven

Are my eyes fucked up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's obviously nine you pan-arab zionist !

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

People take your joke so personally lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

look at the ends. probably you're thinking of seven (7) stacked together

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

cover up the ends. the spaces between the lines are the tops of the blocks, except the bottom-most one, which is the side of a block.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I see the problem, the artist forgot the rest of the sentence:

“Four-sided objects, of which there are three.”

Boom. Done. EZPZ. Do better, artist.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Rectangular prisms have 6 sides though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

You discovered "political nuance"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know why there's even a debate over that. The answer is clearly "Yanny."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago

no, it's blue and gold

[–] [email protected] 239 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I can’t see four. I’m sure it’s there, it just doesn’t appear to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

Originally it was supposed to be an optical illusion that looks like three or four rods from different angles.

This edit has changed it to be just literally three. It's a joke on certain people denying reality.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 20 hours ago

I think the joke is that there's indeed unequivocally just three, and that one of them still says four despite that fact, contradicting the readers expectations who normally for this format expects the middle thing to be something that changes with perspective (eg. 6 vs 9)

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you not see four? Your really missing out. I think some guys even started worshiping it. We even started selling a book about four. Once you see it, you can join out super cool club and four based economy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 183 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What it feels like having a conversation with conservatives

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting. I guess it’s about cultural conditioning. Growing up in Scandinavia the “both sides” and subjectivist approach was more common for leftists. Especially the “your terrorist is my freedom fighter”. In contrast rightists and liberals usually insisted on exactly this two-plus-two-is-four rhetoric. As analyzing American discourse from the outside I’m still not sure if the right wingers of my Nordic childhood was right anyway, or if American leftism has regressed horrendously

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

If we were talking about the normal version where one perspective does see 4 sides and the other 3, then I'd agree. But right wingers often completely ignore science and facts for what they feel is right - despite loudly claiming the opposite. They're simply wrong about any number of things, from economics to gender studies to climate change, but they insist on their positions because of how they feel on a fundamental level - that all the common-sense folks around them think this way, their preacher thinks this way, and they don't trust anyone they haven't personally encountered long enough to understand. Time and time again, science has disproven explicitly conservative viewpoints, from race biology to Social Darwinism to climate change and so on. But they double down because to change their perspectives risks alienating their peers, or even worse, possibly damning them to Hell.

That's why I said what I did. Liberals are a pain in the ass and generally incapable of accomplishing much of value, but at least they typically welcome new data that may contradict a previously-held position.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (25 children)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least there are no centrists in here claiming it's 3.5

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This thread is basically what modern politics feels like

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Instructions unclear, I got my dick caught in the number 8.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Is there a way to see this as four? I’m assuming so but legitimately can’t see anything other than three. Is that the joke and I’m overthinking‽ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 210 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It's a riff on an old meme.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Thank you. I've seen the old one before and I knew there was an illusion but I obviously couldn't find it in the OP.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

my favorite thing is when a comic has a very clear message but it's also written at the top what it's about and whay i should take from the message is further explained below.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

alternative interpretation: it's only possible to be neither right nor wrong on something when the object is physically impossible

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

I agree with you on that.

But alternatively: humans can only see a portion of the whole reality of a given situation, and that specific angle can often be misleading.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›