this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
209 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit 7:13 PM Pacific
Kentucky (8), Indiana (11), West Virginia (4), Florida (30), South Carolina (9), Tennessee (11), Alabama (9), Mississippi (6), Oklahoma (7), Arkansas (6), North Dakota (3), South Dakota (3), Nebraska (5*), Wyoming (3), Louisiana (8), Texas (40), Ohio (17), Missouri (10), Montana (4), Utah (6) called for Trump.

Vermont (3), Connecticut (7), District of Columbia (3), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), Rhode Island (4), Delaware (3), Illinois (19), New Jersey (14), New York (28), Colorado (10) for Harris.

2 counties in PA have extended voting hours due to voting machine problems. 9:30 PM in one, 10:00 PM in the other.

Multiple precincts in Georgia have extended hours due to bomb threats.

Edit 03:09 PM Pacific Harris wins Guam.

https://www.guampdn.com/news/guam-picks-harris-over-trump-in-non-binding-presidential-straw-poll/article_657b06b8-9b97-11ef-9896-1302c4e2ebe9.html

This thread is for the Presidential election, my plan is to start marking wins as soon as they are called, sorted by time zone.

Some states are going to take longer than others. Polls generally close at 8 PM local time, but they can't start counting early/mail in votes until after the polls close.

Wisconsin in particular has an interesting system where ballots are collected by MUNICIPALITY, not precinct, they have over 1,800 ballot counting locations and don't report until ALL 1,800 are in.

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2024/10/22/wisconsin-voters-election-milwaukee-security-denier

Currently 232 EC votes from Blue States:

4+19+10+7+3+3+4+10+11 +4+14+28+4+3+13+54+12 +10+5+8+6

93 EC votes from Battleground States:

10+16+15+16+19+11+6

Which leaves 213 EC votes in Red States.

9+6+6+6+8+6+10+5+3+7 +3+40+30+11+8+17+9+11+4+3+4+4+3

270 to Win.

Online map here!

https://apnews.com/projects/election-results-2024/

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

Why da fk is CNN just totalling all the red states as if Donald Trump is winning right now? 😑😑

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Well good night folks. I hope blue wall results trickle in over the night paint a more positive picture.

Because the picture uptill now, especially considering many ballots counted during the day were prioritised EV or vote by mail ballots, is looking pretty grim.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234 4 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Texas didn't turn blue, but some inland states that were red did turn blue

Source: AP News

[–] [email protected] 2 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

Which would those be? Canadian asking.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Anyone got ten bucks right now on Trump declaring victory in the next 2 hours (from 6:21 pacific time) and saying everything after that is stolen?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 51 minutes ago

Yeah I think that's the plan. IDK enough about states & timezones to say exactly when but surely we're approaching that time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 56 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

I hope fivethirtyeight’s caveman election model is more accurate than the NYT one.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234 10 points 2 hours ago

There is a somewhat close battle in Texas over the electoral college

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I know it’s too early to tell but Tx being blue is making me so hard 😂

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It’s leaning red again, but only 11% reporting, so it’s still too early.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Unfortunately (but probably not surprisingly) AP just called Texas for Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 hours ago (6 children)

God this hurts to watch right now. There's too many data points to comprehend but too few for commentators to tell me the trend.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 49 minutes ago

I'm multi-screening about five different media sources and am letting you know that The New York Times just updated its live presidential forecast to predict a 67% chance of a Trump victory.

The day started out with the NYT in a toss-up position, but as the count has continued, it has started to slowly creep towards Trump.

Let's remember that many votes are yet to be counted and that in 2016, this same tracker at The New York Times was predicting a Clinton victory with 95% certainty.

link

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

So far, no real surprises.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 55 minutes ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 52 minutes ago

a lot of crushed teeth tonight

[–] [email protected] -1 points 21 minutes ago

Looking forward to checking the results on my next break and seeing trump winning every swing state. I knew he would win, it is both the funniest and worst outcome, it was meant to be. We're gonna watch his brain turn ever more thoroughly into goo for the next ~4 years and make even more insane headlines than last time.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›