this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
64 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2440 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 days ago (2 children)

…which is not, despite the name, a government agency.

There it is.

The earlier stories (or headlines) left me wondering how they were going to blatantly get around the humongous conflict of interest.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

that function is literally part of the gao's mission.

i can already read the future headlines:

government accountability office (gao) report states musk-led 'efficiency department' is needless waste of public funds.

followed two days later by:
trump sacks gene dodaro, comptroller general and head of government accountability office.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

One. Trump can't fire the Comptroller. They report to Congress.

Two. Trump will get to select the next Comptroller on December 22 of 2025. So it's kind of a moot point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Exactly. The Ministry of Truth says _________ (fill in the blank as needed.)

It will sound like a government agency is providing recommendations, but in truth it's whatever Elon says.

It won't have government employees or have to follow government rules. It's just an expensive government contractor with no rules. It won't have to prove itself. Just "the algorithm" that has the answer to any problem. How did it arrive at that answer? Difficult to say, it's proprietary. Assuming any accountability, it won't be uncovered until years after the decision has already been made.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm so torn right now, debating on whether or not to uproot my life and move to the EU so I can get away from this insanity and watch the country burn from the sidelines, or stick around and see if enough of us can collectively get our asses in gear and steer this ship out of the shitstorm we're now driving into.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

You should stay. We should stand up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Uproot it. It will be more interesting and fulfilling if you do.

It’s a lot harder than you think though.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Xhitter is down 85% and has become a incel and racist hate filled Russian propaganda machine under Musk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

seems to me that they got every thing they paid for them and it was a good price to pay.

not sure what meaning, if any, being "85% down", has in that context.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

My word, what a brain trust right there: Donvict, Musk and Ramaswamy. JFC.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This? Is all y'all's fault who were against Neuromancer being required reading for middle school on up. I mean, fuck, we barely have Fahrenheit 451 in the curriculum. Way to pull the rug, ya fuckin' blue-haired bootstrappers. I hope you live long enough to experience the horror you stepped aside for. 🥰🤦🏽‍♂️