26
[Micro review]All hail the Tamron 150-500
(lemmy.world)
Pros:
- Sharp
- Nice construction
- Effective VR/OIS
- Fast and accurate AF with good tracking. I've used it for a mix of birds, bugs, and youth sports. It's never failed to disappoint
- It's not white and collapses somewhat small for a longish FF lens. I like to believe the lens didn't stand out that badly when I use it to shoot youth sports. At least I had multiple parents tell me they appreciated the photos. The hood adds a decent amount of visual mass and it's probably not needed 95% of the time
- Decent pseudo macro, but only at the wide end (1:3.1 aka 0.32x)
- 500mm is 25% more reach than 400mm and is enough for my needs. I'm on e-mount and this lens combo is faster than Sony's 100-400 with a teleconverter
- Good price to performance ratio
- The lens has a focal length lock that uses a clutch like mechanism to lock the lens at any focal length. It seems a bit gimmicky, but I find it useful
- My copy appears fairly well centered, so yay
Cons:
- Stiff zoom action and somewhat front heavy when fully zoomed. There's no manual focusing this lens when it's fully zoomed unless you're using a monopod or tripod
- It's a bit heavy, but is on par for this focal length on a FF lens. If you only need 400mm, get a 400mm lens to save some heft. I use this lens exclusively hand held, but I'm also reasonably fit. I have sat on the ground and used a knee as a makeshift monopod at times though
- Somewhat slow aperture, but this also on par for the focal length. I only use this lens outdoors, so it's never been an issue. As far as consumer lenses go, there's not much faster out there at this focal length
- If you need a long lens you're going to need something longer than 500mm. There's obviously more reach here than a 400mm lens, but it's not that much more. This isn't a real con about this lens, just know what focal length you need and go from there
- No teleconverters on e-mount
Bottom line:
- If this focal length is your jam, this could be your lens
- If you don't need the reach, get something lighter and more compact
- If you don't mind walking around with a massive lens and you're on e-mount, Sony's 200-600 zoom action is really hard to beat
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/151641b3-522c-4184-b2b0-9d0f4ff9dffa.jpeg)
If it was only one shitty ancient system it would be one thing. For the company I work for it's about 10 big interconnected mainframe systems with hundreds of non-mainframe systems cobbled together around them. They've been in place since the 80s, but you can trace their business logic back to the 50s and 60s. They start at cataloging all our parts and get into purchasing components from suppliers, describing the products we assemble, managing the supply chains for our factories, order management from our customers, etc.
Replacing it all will be massive chore, but it's becoming more and more clear that we need to. At the end of the day, capturing and understanding data in them takes so much skill that we have entire departments dedicated to being an interface between the actual users and the mainframe. The business rules might have worked before the products we build contained electronic controls, but everything is starting to implode now that "parts" also includes software. This has resulted in manual workaround on top of manual workaround.